Southeastern PA
Call Us

Blog

Chester County November 2025 Residential Real Estate Market Update Graph

November 2025 Chester County, PA Residential Real Estate Market Update

December 17, 2025

📊 Quick Market Snapshot: November 2025

  • Months Supply of Inventory: 3 months (Stable from 3 months in October 2025)
  • Average Days on Market: 26 days (Stable from 26 days in October 2025)
  • Sale Price-to-Original Price Ratio (SP/OP):
  • Average: 101.13% (Up from 99.21% in October 2025)
  • Median: 100% (Stable from 100.00% in October 2025)
  • Insight: The sharp improvement in the Average SP/OP Ratio and the reduced days on market suggest that properties that were priced correctly moved swiftly and efficiently in November.

The November market in Chester County experienced the anticipated seasonal slowdown in transaction volume. However, the month was defined by a remarkable stability in pricing and an increased efficiency in sales velocity, suggesting that committed buyers and sellers are acting decisively as the year closes.

Market Insights: November 2025 Chester County Real Estate Report

Key Market Metrics:

  • Number of Closed Sales: 348 (Down significantly from 479 in October 2025)
  • Current Price Average: $783,893 (Up from $775,746 in October 2025)
  • Current Price Median: $570,000 (Down slightly from $580,000 in October 2025)
  • Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM) Average: 30 days (Down from 37 days in October 2025)
  • Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM) Median: 10 days (Stable from 10 days in October 2025)
  • Number of Price Reductions: 247 (Down from 342 in October 2025)
  • Median Percentage Price Reduction: 4.47% (Down from 5.34% in October 2025)

Comparison to October 2025

November saw a clear seasonal dip in sales volume, but the quality and speed of transactions improved significantly:

  • Closed Sales Volume: Sales dropped to 348 units, a predictable decrease as the market slows for the holidays.
  • Pricing: The Average Price increased to $783,893, while the Median Price softened slightly to $570,000. This suggests that while there were fewer overall sales, the high-end luxury market maintained strong pricing power.
  • Negotiation Nuance: The Average SP/OP Ratio jumped to 99.80%, a major positive indicator showing sellers secured prices much closer to their ask than last month. While the Median Ratio dipped just below 100%, the overall trend is toward less negotiating room for buyers.
  • Market Velocity: The CDOM Average dropped by seven days to 30 days, signaling that older, lingering inventory finally moved or was pulled, leaving a healthier, faster-moving selection of properties. The Median CDOM holding at 10 days confirms fresh, desired inventory moves at lightning speed.
  • Price Reductions: The number of reductions fell by nearly 100 listings, and the depth of the typical reduction decreased. This is strong evidence that pricing is becoming more accurate and the market is more efficient.

Mortgage & Payment Types (November 2025)

Financing trends in November reinforced the market's reliance on highly liquid buyers, with Cash transactions surging compared to last month (27.17% vs. 21.71% in October), often giving these buyers an edge in competition.

  • Conventional: 290 units (66.21%)
  • Cash: 119 units (27.17%)
  • VA: 10 units (2.28%)
  • Other/Minor Financing Types: 19 units (4.34%) (Includes FHA, ARM, Private, PHFA, and multi-type financing)

November 2025 Chester County by School District: Summary Data

The ranking of school districts by average sold price remained consistent, with the ultra-luxury markets of Great Valley and Tredyffrin-Easttown leading the county.

  • Great Valley: Average Sold Price: $996,784
  • Tredyffrin-Easttown: Average Sold Price: $813,125
  • Unionville-Chadds Ford: Average Sold Price: $785,950
  • West Chester Area: Average Sold Price: $759,628
  • Owen J Roberts: Average Sold Price: $660,038
  • Kennett Consolidated: Average Sold Price: $637,157
  • Downingtown Area: Average Sold Price: $602,762
  • Avon Grove: Average Sold Price: $584,831
  • Phoenixville Area: Average Sold Price: $531,188
  • Oxford Area: Average Sold Price: $461,326
  • Twin Valley: Average Sold Price: $446,171
  • Coatesville Area: Average Sold Price: $406,912
  • Octorara Area: Average Sold Price: $373,857
  • Spring Ford Area: Average Sold Price: $327,917

November 2025 Residential Sales by School District and Township

Luxury Markets (Average SP/OP Ratio above 100%)

  • Tredyffrin-Easttown: Average SP/OP Ratio: 101.41% | Led by Easttown Township, where homes sold for an average of 4.35% over asking.
  • West Chester Area: Average SP/OP Ratio: 100.83% | West Goshen and East Goshen Townships both showed an average of over 1.25% above asking.
  • Owen J Roberts: Average SP/OP Ratio: 101.05% | Strong price retention across the district.
  • Coatesville Area: Average SP/OP Ratio: 102.95% | The highest price retention in the county, driven by aggressive sales in West Caln and West Brandywine Townships.

High Velocity Markets (Average CDOM 30 days or less)

  • West Chester Area (20 days): Maintained exceptional speed across its townships.
  • Owen J Roberts (20 days): Fast-moving market with low days on market.
  • Tredyffrin-Easttown (24 days): Still selling quickly despite high price points.
  • Phoenixville Area (23 days): Strong demand kept average days on market low.

High-Value Pockets by Township (Selected)

  • Willistown Township (Great Valley): Average Sold Price: $1,372,538
  • Easttown Township (Tredyffrin-Easttown): Average Sold Price: $1,150,720
  • West Pikeland Township (Downingtown Area): Average Sold Price: $1,215,333

Summary & Outlook

November demonstrated that while the overall volume decreased, the underlying strength of the Chester County residential market is sound. The improvements in both the Average SP/OP Ratio and the Average CDOM are clear evidence of a more efficient, less congested market compared to October. The significant jump in cash buyers (27.17% of transactions) suggests that the market remains highly liquid and competitive for sellers who value speed and certainty.

  • For Sellers: The data suggests that buyers are ready to pay full price or more for accurately valued homes. Listing inventory now, while competition is low, can yield fast results.
  • For Buyers: The increase in sales efficiency means the market is less forgiving for low offers. However, the slight drop in the Median Sold Price offers targeted opportunities in the mid-range market.

Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions or would like a more detailed analysis of specific areas.

If you like what you see...

✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends!

✅ Explore other November 2025 Market Reports:

Data Disclaimer & Disclosure

All information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. All data and statistics are provided by Bright MLS for the period of November 2025.

The Broker makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data, whether collected directly or provided by Bright MLS or its participants. This information is subject to errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, including, but not limited to, those from data entry. Additionally, this report does not account for off-market transactions, private sales, or transactions conducted outside of Bright MLS. This report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as real estate advice. Since individual circumstances vary, all real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular needs.

Chester County November 2025 Residential Real Estate Rental Market Update Graph

November 2025 Chester County Residential Rental Market Update

December 16, 2025

📊 Quick Market Snapshot

November 2025 Chester County Residential Rental Market Update

  • Total Units Leased: 121 (Down from 133 in October 2025)
  • Countywide Rents (Estimated): Average: $2,427 & Median: $2,400 (Up from $2,300 in October 2025)
  • Sale Price-to-Original Price Ratio (Median): 100.00% (Up from 96.60% in October 2025)
  • Days on Market (CDOM): Average: 47 days (Down from 52 days in October 2025)
  • Days on Market (CDOM): Median: 35 days (Down from 42 days in October 2025)

Welcome to the Trago Realty market update for the Chester County Residential Rental Market. This report summarizes residential leasing activity across the entire county during November 2025, comparing the key performance indicators to October.

The November market showed a continued seasonal slowdown in volume but offered tenants quicker options. The leasing pace increased significantly, with fewer days on market, but the overall sales-to-list ratio confirms that landlords are generally securing leases by offering small concessions on price.

Countywide Overview – November 2025

  • Total Units Leased: 121 (Volume dipped slightly from 133 units in October.)
  • Median Rent (Estimated): $2,400 (Slight increase, suggesting strong demand for median-priced rentals.)
  • Median SP/OP Ratio: 100.00% (A significant jump, indicating the median rental secured its asking price this month.)
  • Median Days on Market: 35 days (A quicker pace than October's 42 days, confirming that tenant decision-making time has shortened.)

School District Performance

School District Overview

Highlights:

  • Phoenixville Area remained the highest volume market, leasing 35 units, followed by West Chester Area and Downingtown Area.
  • Octorara Area commanded the highest average rent at $4,500 based on a low volume sale, while Great Valley sustained a very high average rent of $3,185 across 14 units.
  • The market velocity improved across the board, with the county Median CDOM dropping by seven days.

District Breakdown (Ranked by Average Rent):

  • Octorara Area – 1 unit – Average Rent: $4,500
  • Twin Valley – 1 unit – Average Rent: $3,250
  • Great Valley – 14 units – Average Rent: $3,185
  • Owen J. Roberts – 4 units – Average Rent: $2,900
  • Unionville-Chadds Ford – 2 units – Average Rent: $2,843
  • Downingtown Area – 22 units – Average Rent: $2,737
  • Avon Grove – 2 units – Average Rent: $2,625
  • West Chester Area – 23 units – Average Rent: $2,420
  • Kennett Consolidated – 12 units – Average Rent: $2,329
  • Tredyffrin-Easttown – 16 units – Average Rent: $2,264
  • Phoenixville Area – 35 units – Average Rent: $2,260
  • Spring-Ford Area – 5 units – Average Rent: $1,999
  • Coatesville Area – 14 units – Average Rent: $1,960
  • Oxford Area – 3 units – Average Rent: $1,883

School District-to-Township Breakdown

Below are the median rental prices and market metrics by township for several key school districts, reflecting localized variations.

Downingtown Area (22 units, Average Rent $2,737)

  • This district saw a higher average rent than the county median, showing strong, sustained demand for its sub-markets.
  • Median CDOM for DASD: 35 days, matching the county median.

West Chester Area (23 units, Average Rent $2,420)

  • A key volume leader, the average rent here remains slightly above the county median, appealing to a broad segment of renters.
  • Median CDOM for WCASD: 26 days, significantly faster than the county median, indicating high velocity.

Tredyffrin-Easttown (16 units, Average Rent $2,264)

  • A high-demand school district whose average rent is now slightly below the county average, potentially due to a mix of apartment and single-family leases this month.

Great Valley (14 units, Average Rent $3,185)

  • One of the most expensive rental markets in the county, driven by demand for premier properties in townships like Malvern and East Whiteland.

Observations & Summary

November marked a shift toward a faster, cleaner rental market compared to the negotiation-heavy atmosphere in October.

  • Market Velocity: The drop in the Median CDOM from 42 days to 35 days is the most positive sign for landlords, indicating that rental listings are converting to leases more quickly.
  • Negotiation Power: The jump in the Median SP/OP Ratio back to 100.00% confirms that the typical landlord is no longer needing to discount the asking price to secure a tenant. This suggests appropriately priced inventory is leasing quickly and without concession.
  • Inventory: The market holds approximately 3 months of inventory, a healthy level that offers tenants choice while ensuring listings do not languish indefinitely.

Key Takeaways:

The rental market is exiting its seasonal slowdown with increased speed and improved price retention for landlords. Tenants should be prepared to act quickly, as the median decision time has shortened considerably.

Stay Connected

✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends!

✅ Explore other November 2025 Market Reports:

Data Disclaimer & Disclosure

All information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. All data and statistics are provided by Bright MLS for the period of November 2025.

The Broker makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data, whether collected directly or provided by Bright MLS or its participants. This information is subject to errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, including, but not limited to, those from data entry.

Additionally, this report does not account for off-market transactions, private sales, or transactions conducted outside of Bright MLS. This report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as real estate advice. Since individual circumstances vary, all real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular needs.

Downingtown Area School District November 2025 Residential Real Estate Market Update Graph

November 2025 Downingtown Area School District Residential Real Estate Market Update

December 16, 2025

📊 Quick Market Snapshot — November 2025

Downingtown Area School District Real Estate Market

  • On-Market Residential Transactions Sold: 67 (Up from 60 in October 2025)
  • Median Sold Price: $650,000 (Down from $668,743 in October 2025)
  • Average Sold Price: $819,187 (Down from $840,785 in October 2025)
  • Median Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM): 16 days (Up slightly from 14 days in October 2025)
  • Average Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM): 36 days (Down from 42 days in October 2025)
  • Median Sold Price-to-Original Price Ratio: 98.87% (Up from 98.42% in October 2025)
  • Average Sold Price-to-Original Price Ratio: 100.23% (Down from 101.36% in October 2025)

Welcome to the Trago Realty market update for the Downingtown Area School District (DASD) service area. This report summarizes residential sales activity within the various municipalities of the DASD during November 2025.

November saw the DASD market experience a slight drop in median price, but transactions picked up speed and volume compared to October. While competition remained high, the softening of the average sale-to-list price ratio indicates that strategic buyers are finding slightly more negotiating leverage.

🔑 Market Insights: Price, Velocity, and Competition

November was characterized by an increase in transaction volume and a highly competitive, yet slightly more volatile, pricing environment.

Pricing and Negotiation

  • Both the median and average sold prices saw a slight pullback from October's highs.
  • The Average Sold Price-to-Original Price Ratio remained above 100% at 100.23%, indicating that, on average, homes still sold for more than their initial asking price.
  • Conversely, the Median Ratio increased to 98.87%, showing the typical seller is getting closer to their original list price compared to last month (98.42%).
  • Price Reductions were observed on 34 listings, similar to previous trends, with the average reduction being 5.43%, suggesting that sellers must be strategic with their initial list price.

Transaction Volume and Speed

The market successfully closed 67 transactions, a healthy increase over the 60 sales recorded in October.

  • While the Median CDOM slightly increased to 16 days, the Average CDOM dropped from 42 days to 36 days.

Financing Snapshot:

The distribution of financing sources remained robust, with cash buyers accounting for more than one in four transactions, a key factor driving price competition.

  • Conventional: 46 units (68.66%)
  • Cash: 17 units (25.37%)
  • Adjustable Rate Mortgage: 2 units (2.99%)
  • FHA: 1 unit (1.49%)
  • Adjustable Rate Mortgage, Conventional: 1 unit (1.49%)

🏡 Market Performance by Township

The DASD continues to feature high-value townships commanding top dollar. West Pikeland Township led the district in average sold price for the second consecutive month.

  • West Pikeland Township: 3 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $1,215,333
  • Uwchlan Township: 12 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $655,500
  • West Bradford Township: 8 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $627,938
  • East Brandywine Township: 16 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $624,259
  • Upper Uwchlan Township: 13 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $605,769
  • East Caln Township: 6 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $505,667
  • Downingtown Borough: 9 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $328,047

🏘️ Market Performance by Township & Subdivision

West Pikeland Township – Average $1,215,333

  • Unspecified Subdivision: $1,512,500 (2 Sales)
  • TWIN HILLS: $621,000 (1 Sale)

Uwchlan Township – Average $655,500

  • WINDHAM: $963,000 (1 Sale)
  • SWEET CLOVER: $900,000 (1 Sale)
  • EAGLEVIEW: $730,000 (3 Sales)
  • MARCHWOOD: $665,500 (2 Sales)
  • RHONDDA: $435,000 (1 Sale)

West Bradford Township – Average $627,938

  • TATTERSALL: $1,108,000 (2 Sales)
  • CRESTMONT FARMS: $515,000 (1 Sale)
  • TOWNES AT SHANNON HILL: $507,500 (1 Sale)
  • STARGAZER VILLAGE: $470,000 (1 Sale)
  • MARSHALLTON: $375,000 (1 Sale)

East Brandywine Township – Average $624,259

  • AMBLESIDE DOWNS: $825,000 (1 Sale)
  • TURNBRIDGE: $707,000 (1 Sale)
  • TUNBRIDGE: $650,000 (1 Sale)
  • BRANDYWINE WALK: $640,857 (6 Sales)
  • STONEMILL VILLAGE: $618,000 (1 Sale)

Upper Uwchlan Township – Average $605,769

  • HERON HILL: $930,000 (1 Sale)
  • DOWLIN MEADOW: $800,000 (1 Sale)
  • WOODLEIGH: $755,000 (1 Sale)
  • EAGLE MANOR: $707,500 (2 Sales)
  • MARSH HARBOUR: $504,375 (4 Sales)
  • BYERS STATION: $419,167 (3 Sales)

East Caln Township – Average $505,667

  • WOODMONT: $707,500 (2 Sales)
  • DOWNINGTOWN WALK: $520,000 (1 Sale)
  • WOODMONT NORTH: $307,000 (2 Sales)

Downingtown Borough – Average $328,047

  • DOWNINGTOWN RIDGE: $468,108 (1 Sale)
  • ROGER HUNT MILL: $425,000 (1 Sale)
  • MAIN STREET VILLAG: $400,000 (1 Sale)

🧭 Summary & Outlook

The November 2025 Downingtown Area School District market shows stability and continued, albeit slightly adjusted, competition. The increase in volume (67 sales) is a positive sign of market fluidity, and the persistent trend of the average home selling above list price (100.23% ratio) confirms strong underlying demand.

  • For Buyers: The average time to close has shortened, emphasizing the need for clean, strong offers. Focus on strategically priced homes, as the slight drop in median price suggests opportunities exist away from the highest-end developments.
  • For Sellers: The market remains robust. With a high ratio of cash buyers and homes selling for over asking on average, a competitive, data-driven list price is likely to generate a strong and swift sale.

Stay Connected

✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends!

✅ Explore other November 2025 Market Reports:

Data Disclaimer & Disclosure

All information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. All data and statistics are provided by Bright MLS for the period of November 2025.

The Broker makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data, whether collected directly or provided by Bright MLS or its participants. This information is subject to errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, including, but not limited to, those from data entry.

Additionally, this report does not account for off-market transactions, private sales, or transactions conducted outside of Bright MLS. This report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as real estate advice. Since individual circumstances vary, all real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular needs.

West Chester Area School District November 2025 Residential Real Estate Market Update Graph

November 2025 West Chester Area School District Residential Real Estate Market Update

December 16, 2025

📊 Quick Market Snapshot – November 2025

West Chester Area School District Market Service Area

  • Total Transactions: 97 Closed Sales (Down from 104 in October 2025)
  • Median Sold Price: $675,000 (Down from $749,950 in October 2025)
  • Average Sold Price: $764,025 (Down from $804,212 in October 2025)
  • Median Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM): 6 days (Down slightly from 7 days in October 2025)
  • Average Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM): 20 days (Down from 24 days in October 2025)
  • Median Sale Price-to-Original List Price Ratio: 100.00% (Stable at 100.00% from October 2025)
  • Average Sale Price-to-Original List Price Ratio: 99.67% (Up slightly from 99.34% in October 2025)

Welcome to the Trago Realty market update for the highly competitive West Chester Area School District (WCASD) service area. This report summarizes residential sales activity across the townships and the Borough during November 2025, comparing the market's performance to the previous month.

The WCASD market remains highly competitive, maintaining premium pricing power despite the onset of seasonal cooling. Although total transactions dipped, homes continued to sell quickly and, on average, at or above their asking price, confirming sustained, intense buyer demand for this desirable school district.

🔑 Market Insights: Price, Velocity, and Competition

November reinforced the theme of sustained competition in the WCASD, with key metrics remaining firmly in seller territory.

Pricing Power and List Price Ratio

  • The Median Sold Price saw a decrease from October.
  • The Median Sale Price-to-Original List Price Ratio held firm at 100.00%. This critical metric confirms that the typical home sold this month received its full list price or more.
  • The Average Sale Price-to-Original List Price Ratio improved to 99.67%, indicating that, on average, sellers are achieving prices extremely close to their original asking price, leaving very little room for buyer negotiation.

Speed of Sale (Velocity)

Despite the seasonal cooldown in transaction volume, the market speed actually increased month-over-month.

  • The Median CDOM dropped to just 6 days, down from 7 days in October. This demonstrates that well-priced homes are going under contract quickly than ever, showcasing the desirability of the area.
  • The market recorded 35 listings with price reductions, averaging 4.81% off the original price. This provides limited negotiation opportunities for buyers, but only on properties that may have been initially overpriced.

Financing Snapshot:

The proportion of cash buyers increased significantly in November, a trend that typically indicates higher competition and contributes to strong sale-to-list price ratios.

  • Conventional: 71 units (73.20% of transactions)
  • Cash: 25 units (25.77% of transactions) - Up significantly from 18.27% in October, representing one in four buyers.
  • PHFA: 1 unit (1.03% of transactions)
  • Other/Minor Financing Types: Less than 1%

🏡 Market Performance by Township (Ranked by Average Sold Price)

West Goshen Township regained the top spot for average sale price, highlighting the premium value buyers place on its communities.

  • West Goshen Township: 26 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $896,363
  • Thornbury Township: 8 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $792,500
  • East Bradford Township: 9 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $752,489
  • West Whiteland Township: 16 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $734,761
  • West Chester Borough: 10 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $686,600
  • Westtown Township: 10 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $686,250
  • East Goshen Township: 18 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $678,217

🏘️ Market Performance by Township & Subdivision (Average Sold Price)

West Goshen Township – Average $896,363

  • GREYSTONE: $1,220,513 (10 Sales)
  • APPLEGATE: $1,070,000 (1 Sale)
  • BROOKFIELD: $1,050,000 (1 Sale)
  • BRANDYWINE KNOLL: $915,000 (1 Sale)
  • ASHFORD: $830,000 (1 Sale)

Thornbury Township – Average $792,500

  • THORNBURY KNOLL: $1,100,000 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $825,000 (3 Sales)
  • CHERRY CREEK: $765,000 (1 Sale)
  • THORNBURY: $730,000 (2 Sales)

East Bradford Township – Average $752,489

  • BRANDYWINE RIVER E: $995,000 (1 Sale)
  • ALLEGIANCE: $980,000 (1 Sale)
  • BLUE ROCK MEADOWS: $947,500 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $782,500 (2 Sales)

West Whiteland Township – Average $734,761

  • EXTON WALK SINGLES: $1,144,536 (5 Sales)
  • WALTZ LEA: $888,500 (1 Sale)
  • LOCHIEL FARM: $691,250 (2 Sales)
  • WHITELAND WEST: $620,000 (1 Sale)

East Goshen Township – Average $678,217

  • APPLEBROOK: $2,300,000 (1 Sale)
  • WATERVIEW: $1,140,000 (1 Sale)
  • WEST CHESTER (General): $991,000 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $905,000 (2 Sales)

🧭 Summary & Outlook

The West Chester Area School District market is exceptionally strong as we head into the year-end. The drop in transaction volume is typical for the season, but the sustained high-velocity (Median CDOM of 6 days) and stable price performance (100.00% Median Sale-to-List Ratio) prove that buyer demand is intense and the supply of desirable homes is critically low.

  • For Buyers: You must be fully prepared to act decisively. The presence of a high number of cash buyers and the short time on market (6 days) demand clean, robust offers, particularly in competitive townships.
  • For Sellers: The market remains firmly in your favor. With homes selling rapidly and for full asking price or more, November was an ideal month to capitalize on peak demand and minimal inventory competition.

Stay Connected

✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends!

✅ Explore other November 2025 Market Reports:

Data Disclaimer & Disclosure

All information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. All data and statistics are provided by Bright MLS for the period of November 2025.

The Broker makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data, whether collected directly or provided by Bright MLS or its participants. This information is subject to errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, including, but not limited to, those from data entry.

This report does not account for off-market transactions, private sales, or transactions conducted outside of Bright MLS. This report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as real estate advice. Since individual circumstances vary, all real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular needs.

Coatesville Area School District November 2025 Residential Real Estate Market Update Graph

November 2025 Coatesville Area School District Residential Real Estate Market Update

December 16, 2025

📊 Quick Market Snapshot – November 2025

On-Market Transactions: 59 Closed Sales (Down from 69 in October 2025)

Median Sold Price: $387,495 (Up from $335,000 in October 2025)

Average Sold Price: $435,085 (Down from $441,463 in October 2025)

Median Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM): 13 days (Down from 14 days in October 2025)

Average Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM): 34 days (Up from 31 days in October 2025)

Sale Price-to-Original List Price Ratio: 100.70% (Up from 96.90% in October 2025)

Welcome to the Trago Realty market update for the Coatesville Area School District (CASD) service area. This report summarizes residential sales activity within the various municipalities of the CASD during November 2025.

Following a slight cooling trend in October, the Coatesville market showed remarkable resilience in November. Key pricing metrics increased significantly, and competitive bidding returned, indicating that the desire for homes in the CASD remains strong despite lower transaction volume as the year winds down.

🔑 Market Insights: Price and Velocity

November was defined by a major swing back toward a seller’s market environment, driven by intense competition among buyers for limited inventory.

Pricing and Negotiation Power

  • The most critical takeaway is the Sale Price-to-Original List Price Ratio, which jumped nearly four percentage points to 100.70%.
  • The Median Sold Price saw a large increase of over $52,000, climbing to $387,495.

Speed of Sale

Market velocity remained exceptionally fast, with the time a property spent on the market actually shortening slightly.

  • The Median CDOM dropped to 13 days, reinforcing that well-priced homes are moving off the market quickly.
  • Price Reductions were less common and less severe than last month. We observed 33 price reductions (down from 37) with an average reduction of 5.33% (down from 6.45%), suggesting sellers are pricing more accurately.

Financing Snapshot:

Conventional loans remain the most common financing type, but the cash buyer segment gained ground this month, likely contributing to the return of competitive bidding.

  • Conventional: 37 units (62.71%)
  • Cash: 10 units (16.95%)
  • VA: 6 units (10.17%)
  • FHA: 3 units (5.08%)
  • Other/Minor Financing Types: 3 units (5.08%) (Includes Cash/Other)

🏡 Market Performance by Township

The Coatesville Area School District features a diverse range of price points. West Caln Township and West Brandywine Township commanded the highest average prices this month, while Valley Township remained a leader in transaction volume.

  • West Caln Township: 7 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $602,857
  • West Brandywine Township: 11 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $524,036
  • East Fallowfield Township: 6 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $426,583
  • Sadsbury Township: 6 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $428,908
  • South Coatesville Borough: 4 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $357,868
  • Caln Township: 7 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $330,957
  • Valley Township: 9 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $307,778
  • Modena Borough: 1 Transaction, Average Sold Price: $245,000
  • Coatesville City: 6 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $209,133

🏘️ Market Performance by Township & Subdivision

Below is a breakdown of performance by municipality, ranked from highest to lowest average sold price. The values listed for each subdivision represent the average sold price for November 2025.

West Caln Township – Average $602,857

  • BEACON HILL: $905,000 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $688,333 (3 Sales)
  • WEST CALN TWP (General): $535,000 (1 Sale)
  • SANDY HILL: $415,000 (1 Sale)
  • SPRING RUN ESTATES: $300,000 (1 Sale)

West Brandywine Township – Average $524,036

  • TRADITIONS OF AMERICA AT WEST BRANDYWINE: $695,000 (1 Sale)
  • GREEN MANOR FARMS: $675,000 (1 Sale)
  • CEDAR KNOLL: $637,450 (2 Sales)
  • LANMARK FARMS: $527,000 (1 Sale)
  • HILLS OVER PRATTS: $440,000 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $438,125 (4 Sales)
  • BRANDYWINE MANOR F: $400,000 (1 Sale)

Sadsbury Township – Average $428,908

  • QUARRY RIDGE: $530,000 (2 Sales)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $393,000 (2 Sales)
  • SADSBURY PARK: $363,725 (2 Sales)

East Fallowfield Township – Average $426,583

  • FOX KNOLL: $440,000 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $437,375 (4 Sales)
  • PROVIDENCE HILL: $370,000 (1 Sale)

South Coatesville Borough – Average $357,868

  • SOUTHVIEW: $375,000 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $372,174 (5 Sales)
  • WESTWOOD RIDGE: $604,500 (1 Sale)
  • LINCOLN CREST MHP: $199,900 (1 Sale)

Caln Township – Average $330,957

  • HILLVIEW: $510,000 (1 Sale)
  • BROOKFIELD: $426,000 (1 Sale)
  • BEAVER RUN KNOLL: $340,000 (1 Sale)
  • CALN CREST: $303,000 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $298,500 (2 Sales)
  • THORNBURY WOODS: $140,700 (1 Sale)

Valley Township – Average $307,778

  • HILLVIEW: $505,000 (1 Sale)
  • OAKCREST: $435,000 (1 Sale)
  • VALLEY SQUARE TOWNS: $320,000 (1 Sale)
  • SPRING BROOK VILLAGE: $318,000 (1 Sale)
  • VALLEY CROSSING: $305,000 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $255,667 (3 Sales)
  • TAYLOR MHP: $120,000 (1 Sale)

Modena Borough – Average $245,000

  • MODENA: $245,000 (1 Sale)

Coatesville City – Average $209,133

  • HIGHLANDS AT MILLVIEW: $398,000 (1 Sale)
  • CARRIAGE PARK: $250,000 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $151,700 (4 Sales)

Stay Connected

✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends!

✅ Explore other November 2025 Market Reports:

Disclaimer & Disclosure

All information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. All data and statistics are provided by Bright MLS for the period of November 2025.

The Broker makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data, whether collected directly or provided by Bright MLS or its participants. This information is subject to errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, including, but not limited to, those from data entry.

This report does not account for off-market transactions, private sales, or transactions conducted outside of Bright MLS. This report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as real estate advice. Since individual circumstances vary, all real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular needs.

Chester County October 2025 Residential Real Estate Market Update Graph

October 2025 Chester County, PA Residential Real Estate Market Update

November 25, 2025

📊 Quick Market Snapshot: October 2025

  • Months Supply of Inventory: 3 months
  • Average Days on Market: 26 days
  • Sale Price-to-Original Price Ratio (SP/OP):
  • Average: 99.21%
  • Median: 100.00%
  • Insight: While the median home is still selling for its full original price, the average dropping below 100% suggests that price reductions are becoming necessary for some listings to cross the finish line.

Market Insights: October 2025 Chester County Real Estate Report

Key Market Metrics:

  • Current Price Average: $775,746
  • Current Price Median: $580,000
  • Days to Sell Average: 26 days
  • Days to Sell Median: 9 days
  • Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM) Average: 37 days
  • Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM) Median: 10 days
  • Number of Price Reductions: 342
  • Median Percentage Price Reduction: 5.34%
  • Number of Closed Sales: 479

Comparison to September 2025

Comparing October’s performance to September 2025 reveals a definitive seasonal shift and a cooling trend in buyer urgency:

  • Closed Sales Volume: Sales dipped slightly from 496 units in September to 479 units in October. This gradual decrease is consistent with typical autumn market cycles.
  • Price Adjustment: The Median Sale Price softened to $580,000 (down from $599,490 in September). Additionally, the Average Sale Price saw a decrease from roughly $830k to $775k, indicating fewer ultra-luxury closings or a general settling of prices.
  • Negotiation Nuance: The Average SP/OP Ratio dropped to 99.21%, signaling that buyers are finding more room to negotiate on price than in previous months. However, the Median SP/OP Ratio holding firm at 100.00% indicates that well-priced homes are still commanding full ask.
  • Market Velocity: While the "Days to Sell Average" held steady at 26 days, the Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM) Average jumped significantly to 37 days (up from 26 in September). This suggests that while fresh inventory moves, older inventory is lingering longer.
  • Price Reductions: The number of price reductions climbed to 342 (up from 328), with the median reduction depth increasing to 5.34%, further evidence that sellers are calibrating to meet buyer demand.

Mortgage & Payment Types (October 2025)

Financing trends in October showed a surge in conventional financing dominance, while cash transactions saw a slight decrease compared to September:

  • Conventional: 69.94%
  • Cash: 21.71%
  • FHA: 3.55%
  • VA: 2.71%
  • Other: 0.84%
  • Adjustable Rate Mortgage (ARM): 0.42%
  • Installment Sale: 0.21%
  • PHFA: 0.21%
  • FHA 203k/203b: 0.42%

October 2025 Chester County by School District: Summary Data

Here is a summary breakdown of residential real estate activity across Chester County's school districts for October 2025, detailing closed sales volume and the average pricing:

  • West Chester Area: 95 sales | Average Sold Price: $794,896
  • Coatesville Area: 74 sales | Average Sold Price: $366,661
  • Downingtown Area: 62 sales | Average Sold Price: $654,878
  • Phoenixville Area: 42 sales | Average Sold Price: $532,454
  • Tredyffrin-Easttown: 34 sales | Average Sold Price: $1,155,497
  • Great Valley: 30 sales | Average Sold Price: $1,020,576
  • Owen J Roberts: 30 sales | Average Sold Price: $558,176
  • Kennett Consolidated: 29 sales | Average Sold Price: $625,351
  • Avon Grove: 22 sales | Average Sold Price: $504,342
  • Oxford Area: 20 sales | Average Sold Price: $501,180
  • Twin Valley: 14 sales | Average Sold Price: $374,136
  • Unionville-Chadds Ford: 13 sales | Average Sold Price: $1,134,878
  • Octorara Area: 10 sales | Average Sold Price: $393,350
  • Spring-Ford Area: 4 sales | Average Sold Price: $357,500

October 2025 Residential Sales by School District and Township

This breakdown provides a detailed, localized view of sales activity, average pricing, and average annual property tax across Chester County’s municipalities that make up each school district area:

TREDYFFRIN-EASTTOWN (34 units total)

  • Easttown Township: 8 units – Avg Sold Price: $1,832,250 – Avg Tax: $18,778
  • Tredyffrin Township: 26 units – Avg Sold Price: $947,265 – Avg Tax: $8,316

UNIONVILLE-CHADDS FORD (13 units total)

  • Pennsbury Township: 5 units – Avg Sold Price: $1,237,184 – Avg Tax: $12,021
  • Birmingham Township: 5 units – Avg Sold Price: $1,157,500 – Avg Tax: $14,645
  • Pocopson Township: 2 units – Avg Sold Price: $977,500 – Avg Tax: $13,738
  • West Marlboro Township: 1 unit – Avg Sold Price: $825,000 – Avg Tax: $9,822

GREAT VALLEY (30 units total)

  • Willistown Township: 15 units – Avg Sold Price: $1,330,964 – Avg Tax: $8,455
  • East Whiteland Township: 7 units – Avg Sold Price: $779,129 – Avg Tax: $4,000
  • Charlestown Township: 5 units – Avg Sold Price: $740,800 – Avg Tax: $7,341
  • Malvern Borough: 3 units – Avg Sold Price: $498,300 – Avg Tax: $5,510

WEST CHESTER AREA (95 units total)

  • Thornbury Township: 5 units – Avg Sold Price: $987,400 – Avg Tax: $8,886
  • West Goshen Township: 19 units – Avg Sold Price: $902,657 – Avg Tax: $3,643
  • West Chester Borough: 12 units – Avg Sold Price: $819,239 – Avg Tax: $5,533
  • West Whiteland Township: 25 units – Avg Sold Price: $818,515 – Avg Tax: $4,743
  • Westtown Township: 7 units – Avg Sold Price: $689,286 – Avg Tax: $6,169
  • East Bradford Township: 12 units – Avg Sold Price: $680,504 – Avg Tax: $5,697
  • East Goshen Township: 15 units – Avg Sold Price: $676,190 – Avg Tax: $5,829

DOWNINGTOWN AREA (62 units total)

  • West Pikeland Township: 3 units – Avg Sold Price: $1,253,333 – Avg Tax: $16,443
  • Wallace Township: 3 units – Avg Sold Price: $1,082,066 – Avg Tax: $10,953
  • East Brandywine Township: 11 units – Avg Sold Price: $656,475 – Avg Tax: $2,846
  • Uwchlan Township: 11 units – Avg Sold Price: $648,108 – Avg Tax: $7,058
  • West Bradford Township: 14 units – Avg Sold Price: $635,950 – Avg Tax: $7,332
  • Upper Uwchlan Township: 11 units – Avg Sold Price: $597,091 – Avg Tax: $5,245
  • Downingtown Borough: 3 units – Avg Sold Price: $454,833 – Avg Tax: $3,767
  • East Caln Township: 6 units – Avg Sold Price: $401,667 – Avg Tax: $4,414

KENNETT CONSOLIDATED (29 units total)

  • East Marlboro Township: 10 units – Avg Sold Price: $757,940 – Avg Tax: $10,861
  • Kennett Township: 13 units – Avg Sold Price: $574,200 – Avg Tax: $7,119
  • New Garden Township: 5 units – Avg Sold Price: $532,235 – Avg Tax: $7,063
  • Kennett Square Borough: 1 unit – Avg Sold Price: $430,000 – Avg Tax: $5,524

OWEN J ROBERTS (30 units total)

  • West Vincent Township: 2 units – Avg Sold Price: $1,052,500 – Avg Tax: $13,858
  • East Nantmeal Township: 2 units – Avg Sold Price: $771,000 – Avg Tax: $2,254
  • Warwick Township: 1 unit – Avg Sold Price: $646,000 – Avg Tax: $10,589
  • East Vincent Township: 7 units – Avg Sold Price: $632,970 – Avg Tax: $4,601
  • East Coventry Township: 5 units – Avg Sold Price: $540,200 – Avg Tax: $8,010
  • South Coventry Township: 2 units – Avg Sold Price: $469,500 – Avg Tax: $6,938
  • North Coventry Township: 11 units – Avg Sold Price: $398,318 – Avg Tax: $5,262

PHOENIXVILLE AREA (42 units total)

  • Schuylkill Township: 8 units – Avg Sold Price: $673,513 – Avg Tax: $8,893
  • East Pikeland Township: 10 units – Avg Sold Price: $509,025 – Avg Tax: $5,331
  • Phoenixville Borough: 24 units – Avg Sold Price: $495,197 – Avg Tax: $4,691

AVON GROVE (22 units total)

  • Franklin Township: 2 units – Avg Sold Price: $907,250 – Avg Tax: $8,713
  • New London Township: 3 units – Avg Sold Price: $615,667 – Avg Tax: $7,937
  • Penn Township: 5 units – Avg Sold Price: $464,400 – Avg Tax: $6,190
  • London Grove Township: 5 units – Avg Sold Price: $453,000 – Avg Tax: $6,111
  • London Britain Township: 2 units – Avg Sold Price: $413,013 – Avg Tax: $7,272
  • West Grove Borough: 3 units – Avg Sold Price: $409,667 – Avg Tax: $6,091
  • Avondale Borough: 2 units – Avg Sold Price: $396,000 – Avg Tax: $4,016

OXFORD AREA (20 units total)

  • East Nottingham Township: 9 units – Avg Sold Price: $585,485 – Avg Tax: $5,752
  • Upper Oxford Township: 1 unit – Avg Sold Price: $541,964 – Avg Tax: $0 (Note: Confirm specific tax data for this listing)
  • Lower Oxford Township: 4 units – Avg Sold Price: $498,216 – Avg Tax: $1,046
  • Elk Township: 1 unit – Avg Sold Price: $475,000 – Avg Tax: $6,283
  • West Nottingham Township: 3 units – Avg Sold Price: $398,972 – Avg Tax: $5,087
  • Oxford Borough: 2 units – Avg Sold Price: $273,750 – Avg Tax: $3,946

OCTORARA AREA (10 units total)

  • Londonderry Township: 4 units – Avg Sold Price: $505,625 – Avg Tax: $8,097
  • Highland Township: 2 units – Avg Sold Price: $362,500 – Avg Tax: $5,635
  • Atglen Borough: 1 unit – Avg Sold Price: $355,000 – Avg Tax: $6,321
  • Parkesburg Borough: 3 units – Avg Sold Price: $277,000 – Avg Tax: $4,749

TWIN VALLEY (14 units total)

  • Elverson Borough: 2 units – Avg Sold Price: $441,000 – Avg Tax: $4,891
  • West Nantmeal Township: 2 units – Avg Sold Price: $405,000 – Avg Tax: $5,210
  • Honeybrook Township: 8 units – Avg Sold Price: $382,238 – Avg Tax: $5,020
  • Honeybrook Borough: 2 units – Avg Sold Price: $244,000 – Avg Tax: $2,305

COATESVILLE AREA (74 units total)

  • Caln Township: 15 units – Avg Sold Price: $466,608 – Avg Tax: $4,442
  • West Brandywine Township: 9 units – Avg Sold Price: $458,425 – Avg Tax: $8,055
  • West Caln Township: 7 units – Avg Sold Price: $400,286 – Avg Tax: $6,991
  • Sadsbury Township: 5 units – Avg Sold Price: $354,160 – Avg Tax: $5,677
  • East Fallowfield Township: 12 units – Avg Sold Price: $347,825 – Avg Tax: $5,869
  • South Coatesville Borough: 3 units – Avg Sold Price: $346,667 – Avg Tax: $7,540
  • Valley Township: 13 units – Avg Sold Price: $337,485 – Avg Tax: $5,257
  • Modena Borough: 1 unit – Avg Sold Price: $277,000 – Avg Tax: $5,619
  • Coatesville City: 9 units – Avg Sold Price: $173,000 – Avg Tax: $3,169

SPRING-FORD AREA (4 units total)

  • Spring City Borough: 4 units – Avg Sold Price: $357,500 – Avg Tax: $4,750

Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions or would like a more detailed analysis of specific areas.

If you like what you see...

✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends!

Explore other October 2025 Market Reports:

Data Disclaimer & Disclosure

All information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness.

All data and statistics are provided by Bright MLS for the period of October 2025.

The Broker makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data, whether collected directly or provided by Bright MLS or its participants. This information is subject to errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, including, but not limited to, those from data entry.

Additionally, this report does not account for off-market transactions, private sales, or transactions conducted outside of Bright MLS.

This report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as real estate advice. Since individual circumstances vary, all real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular needs.

Chester County October 2025 Residential Real Estate Rental Market Update Graph

October 2025 Chester County Residential Rental Market Update

November 25, 2025

📊 Quick Market Snapshot

October 2025 Chester County Residential Rental Market Update

  • Total Units Leased: 133
  • Countywide Rents: Average: $2,406 & Median: $2,300
  • Sale Price-to-Original Price Ratio (Median): 96.60%
  • Days on Market (CDOM): Average: 52 & Median: 42

By comparison, September reported higher volume (154 units) and a significantly faster leasing pace (Median CDOM of 28). October’s data signals a seasonal cooling, with days on market lengthening and the median Sale Price-to-Original Price (SP/OP) ratio dropping below 100% for the first time in recent months, indicating landlords are negotiating more on price to secure tenants.

Countywide Overview – October 2025

MetricChester CountyMoM Change (vs. Sept 2025)Total Units Leased133↓ from 154Median Rent$2,300≈ Stable (slight dip from $2,325)Median SP/OP Ratio96.60%↓ from 100.00%Median Days on Market42↑ from 28

School District Performance

School District Overview

Highlights:

  • Great Valley commanded the highest median rents in the county ($3,000), but also saw one of the longest marketing times (Median CDOM 87), suggesting high-end inventory is sitting longer.
  • Phoenixville Area and West Chester Area remain the volume leaders, accounting for nearly 40% of all closed rentals combined.
  • Avon Grove and Oxford Area offered the fastest turnover, with rentals moving in under 20 days on average, albeit on lower inventory volume.

District Breakdown (Ranked by Median Rent):

  • Great Valley – 7 units – Median Rent: $3,000 – CDOM: 87
  • Kennett Consolidated – 5 units – Median Rent: $2,850 – CDOM: 51
  • Downingtown Area – 23 units – Median Rent: $2,695 – CDOM: 44
  • Avon Grove – 1 unit – Median Rent: $2,600 – CDOM: 10
  • West Chester Area – 24 units – Median Rent: $2,538 – CDOM: 34
  • Octorara Area – 1 unit – Median Rent: $2,500 – CDOM: 78
  • Tredyffrin-Easttown – 13 units – Median Rent: $2,400 – CDOM: 32
  • Twin Valley – 4 units – Median Rent: $2,200 – CDOM: 52
  • Spring-Ford Area – 7 units – Median Rent: $2,100 – CDOM: 56
  • Phoenixville Area – 27 units – Median Rent: $1,855 – CDOM: 52
  • Coatesville Area – 17 units – Median Rent: $1,800 – CDOM: 31
  • Owen J. Roberts – 1 unit – Median Rent: $1,800 – CDOM: 22
  • Oxford Area – 3 units – Median Rent: $1,350 – CDOM: 18

School District-to-Township Breakdown

Below are the median rental prices by township within each major school district, reflecting localized variations within district boundaries.

Great Valley (7 units, Median Rent $3,000)

  • East Whiteland Township – 2 units – $3,775
  • Charlestown Township – 3 units – $3,000
  • Malvern Borough – 2 units – $2,900

Kennett Consolidated (5 units, Median Rent $2,850)

  • East Marlboro Township – 1 unit – $4,100
  • New Garden Township – 3 units – $2,850
  • Kennett Square Borough – 1 unit – $2,500

Downingtown Area (23 units, Median Rent $2,695)

  • West Bradford Township – 2 units – $3,748
  • Wallace Township – 1 unit – $3,650
  • East Brandywine Township – 1 unit – $3,200
  • Upper Uwchlan Township – 3 units – $3,200
  • East Caln Township – 5 units – $2,800
  • Uwchlan Township – 3 units – $2,700
  • Downingtown Borough – 8 units – $1,663

Avon Grove (1 unit, Median Rent $2,600)

  • West Grove Borough – 1 unit – $2,600

West Chester Area (24 units, Median Rent $2,538)

  • East Bradford Township – 2 units – $6,748
  • West Goshen Township – 2 units – $3,400
  • Westtown Township – 1 unit – $3,000
  • West Whiteland Township – 8 units – $2,875
  • West Chester Borough – 9 units – $2,050
  • East Goshen Township – 2 units – $1,723

Octorara Area (1 unit, Median Rent $2,500)

  • West Fallowfield Township – 1 unit – $2,500

Tredyffrin-Easttown (13 units, Median Rent $2,400)

  • Easttown Township – 2 units – $2,648
  • Tredyffrin Township – 11 units – $2,400

Twin Valley (4 units, Median Rent $2,200)

  • Honeybrook Township – 2 units – $2,425
  • Elverson Borough – 1 unit – $2,400
  • Honeybrook Borough – 1 unit – $2,000

Spring-Ford Area (7 units, Median Rent $2,100)

  • Spring City Borough – 7 units – $2,100

Phoenixville Area (27 units, Median Rent $1,855)

  • East Pikeland Township – 3 units – $2,300
  • Phoenixville Borough – 23 units – $1,855
  • Schuylkill Township – 1 unit – $1,780

Coatesville Area (17 units, Median Rent $1,800)

  • Sadsbury Township – 1 unit – $3,495
  • Valley Township – 1 unit – $2,300
  • Caln Township – 4 units – $2,050
  • West Caln Township – 1 unit – $1,800
  • Modena Borough – 1 unit – $1,800
  • Coatesville City – 9 units – $1,600

Owen J. Roberts (1 unit, Median Rent $1,800)

  • East Coventry Township – 1 unit – $1,800

Oxford Area (3 units, Median Rent $1,350)

  • Oxford Borough – 3 units – $1,350

Observations & Summary

October marked a distinctive shift in the Chester County rental market compared to the previous month. While median rents remained largely stable ($2,300 vs. $2,325 in September), the market velocity has slowed notably. The median cumulative days on market (CDOM) jumped from 28 days in September to 42 days in October, indicating that tenants are taking more time to make decisions and inventory is lingering longer.

Perhaps the most significant metric this month is the Sale Price-to-Original Price Ratio, which dropped to 96.60% (down from 100% in September). This suggests, in some cases landlords are discounting asking rents to secure leases.

Key Takeaways:

  • Negotiation Power: The dip in the SP/OP ratio signals a shift toward a tenant-friendly environment where price negotiation is becoming more common.
  • Luxury Hold Times: Higher-priced districts like Great Valley and Octorara are seeing significantly longer wait times (78+ days) compared to the county median.
  • Inventory Levels: The market currently holds approximately 3 months of inventory, offering tenants more choices than in previous quarters.

Stay Connected

✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends!

Explore other October 2025 Market Reports:

Data Disclaimer & Disclosure

All information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness.

All data and statistics are provided by Bright MLS for the period of October 2025.

The Broker makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data, whether collected directly or provided by Bright MLS or its participants. This information is subject to errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, including, but not limited to, those from data entry.

Additionally, this report does not account for off-market transactions, private sales, or transactions conducted outside of Bright MLS.

This report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as real estate advice. Since individual circumstances vary, all real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular needs.

Downingtown Area School District October 2025 Residential Real Estate Market Update Graph

October 2025 Downingtown Area School District Residential Real Estate Market Update

November 24, 2025

📊 Quick Market Snapshot — October 2025

Downingtown Area School District Real Estate Market

On-Market Residential Transactions Sold: 60

Median / Average

  • Sold Price: $668,743 / $840,785
  • Cumulative Days on Market: 14 / 42
  • Sold Price-to-Original Price Ratio: 98.42% / 101.36%

Financing Snapshot:

  • Conventional: 43 (71.67%)
  • Cash: 14 (23.33%)
  • FHA: 2 (3.33%)
  • VA: 1 (1.67%)

The October market in the Downingtown Area School District shifted gears slightly, showing a significant jump in sale prices despite a slight lengthening in days on market.

Cash transactions ticked up slightly from last month (22.95% to 23.33%), indicating that cash buyers remain a powerful force in the market. Conventional financing continues to be the primary method for purchasing, accounting for over 71% of sales.

🏡 Market Performance by Township

Below is a breakdown of average sold prices by township in the Downingtown Area School District, ranked from highest to lowest, with the number of sales in parentheses.

Note: October saw higher-end activity in West Pikeland and Wallace, driving averages up significantly in those areas.

  1. West Pikeland Township – $1,253,333 (3 Sales)
  2. Wallace Township – $1,082,066 (3 Sales)
  3. East Brandywine Township – $656,475 (11 Sales)
  4. Uwchlan Township – $648,108 (11 Sales)
  5. West Bradford Township – $611,792 (13 Sales)
  6. Upper Uwchlan Township – $597,091 (11 Sales)
  7. Downingtown Borough – $454,833 (3 Sales)
  8. East Caln Township – $346,000 (5 Sales)

🏡 Market Performance by Township & Subdivision

The Downingtown Area School District offers a diverse range of housing. Below are average sold prices by subdivision for October 2025, with the number of sales in parentheses:

West Pikeland Township – Average $1,253,333

  • Chantilly Farm – $1,280,000 (2)
  • Fieldstone Farm – $1,200,000 (1)

Wallace Township – Average $1,082,066

  • None Available – $1,238,100 (2)
  • Highspire Estates – $770,000 (1)

East Brandywine Township – Average $656,475

  • Dowlin Forge Station – $850,000 (1)
  • Applecross – $707,500 (2)
  • Brandywine Walk – $632,180 (4)
  • Stonemill Village – $606,875 (4)

Uwchlan Township – Average $648,108

  • Woodlark Farm – $816,000 (1)
  • Eagleview – $722,000 (3)
  • Valley View – $715,000 (1)
  • Mount Airy Estates – $700,000 (1)
  • Marchwood – $625,062 (3)
  • Rhondda – $440,000 (1)
  • Exton – $417,000 (1)

West Bradford Township – Average $611,792

  • Oak Hollow – $1,275,000 (1)
  • None Available – $1,100,000 (1)
  • Tattersall – $935,000 (2)
  • Summit Ridge – $585,000 (1)
  • Colonial Woods – $575,000 (1)
  • Townes at Shannon Hill – $510,000 (1)
  • Stargazer Village – $500,000 (1)
  • Hidden Valley Farm – $479,900 (1)
  • Brandywine Greene – $360,000 (1)
  • Marshallton – $305,000 (1)
  • Marshalton Walk – $283,400 (1)
  • Appleville West – $110,000 (1)

Upper Uwchlan Township – Average $597,091

  • Preserve at Marsh Creek (Heritage) – $725,000 (1)
  • Byers Station – $671,667 (3)
  • Preserve at Marsh Creek (Carriage) – $653,333 (3)
  • Marshall Creek Farm – $605,000 (1)
  • Windsor Ridge – $518,000 (1)
  • None Available – $375,000 (1)
  • Marsh Harbour – $370,000 (1)

Downingtown Borough – Average $454,833

  • Main Street Village – $480,000 (1)
  • Downingtown Ridge – $464,500 (1)
  • Downingtown Boro – $420,000 (1)

East Caln Township – Average $346,000

  • Ridings at Bell Tavern – $900,000 (1)
  • Woodmont North – $207,500 (4)

🧭 Summary & Outlook

The October 2025 Downingtown Area School District market shows a distinct evolution from September. While sales volume remained consistent (60 sales in October vs. 61 in September), pricing saw a notable increase, with the median sold price jumping to $668,743 (up from $585,000 last month).

However, buyers are taking a little more time to make decisions. The Median Cumulative Days on Market doubled from 7 days in September to 14 days in October. Additionally, the median Sold Price-to-Original Price Ratio dipped to 98.42%, suggesting that while the average sales price is high, some sellers are negotiating slightly off their original list price to get deals across the finish line.

This data indicates a healthy market where premium inventory is commanding high prices, but the "instant sale" frenzy has cooled just enough to give buyers a moment to breathe and negotiate.

Stay Connected

✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends!

Explore other October 2025 Market Reports:

Data Disclaimer & Disclosure

All information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness.

All data and statistics are provided by Bright MLS for the period of October 2025.

The Broker makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data, whether collected directly or provided by Bright MLS or its participants. This information is subject to errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, including, but not limited to, those from data entry.

Additionally, this report does not account for off-market transactions, private sales, or transactions conducted outside of Bright MLS.

This report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as real estate advice. Since individual circumstances vary, all real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular needs.

West Chester Area School District October 2025 Residential Real Estate Market Update Graph

October 2025 West Chester Area School District Residential Real Estate Market Update

November 20, 2025

📊 Quick Market Snapshot – October 2025

West Chester Area School District Market Service Area

Total Transactions: 104 Closed Sales

  • Comparison: Down from 113 in September.

Median Sold Price: $749,950

  • Comparison: Up significantly from $654,900 in September.

Average Sold Price: $804,212

  • Comparison: Up from $740,930 in September.

Median Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM): 7 days

  • Comparison: Up slightly from 6 days in September.

Average Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM): 24 days

  • Comparison: Up from 16 days in September.

Median Sale Price-to-Original List Price Ratio: 100.00%

  • Comparison: Stable at 100.00% from September.

Average Sale Price-to-Original List Price Ratio: 99.34%

  • Comparison: Up slightly from 99.16% in September.

Welcome to the Trago Realty market update for the highly competitive West Chester Area School District (WCASD) service area. This report summarizes residential sales activity across the townships and the Borough during October 2025, comparing the market's performance to the previous month.

October saw a continuation of robust pricing, with both the average and median sold prices increasing. While total transaction volume dipped slightly, the high sale-to-original price ratio and low median days on market confirm that WCASD remains a strong seller's market.

🔑 Market Insights: Price, Velocity, and Competition

The WCASD market continues its upward trajectory in price, with the Median Sold Price jumping by over $95,000 month-over-month. This suggests a strong concentration of sales occurred in the upper-tier suburban developments during October.

The market remains fiercely competitive, reflected by the 100.00% Median Sale Price-to-Original List Price Ratio. This indicates that the typical home sold this month received its full list price or more. While competition is high, the market is not without its opportunities for negotiation; 62 listings recorded price reductions, averaging 5.73% off the original price.

Financing Snapshot:

The buyer pool shifted slightly, with a notable drop in the proportion of cash buyers compared to September.

  • Conventional: 80 units (76.92% of transactions)
  • Cash: 19 units (18.27% of transactions)
  • FHA: 2 units (1.92% of transactions)
  • VA: 1 unit (0.96% of transactions)
  • Other/Minor Financing Types: 2 units (1.92% of transactions)

🏡 Market Performance by Township (Ranked by Average Sold Price)

  • Thornbury Township: 14 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $932,850
  • West Goshen Township: 19 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $902,657
  • West Chester Borough: 12 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $819,239
  • West Whiteland Township: 25 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $818,515
  • Westtown Township: 7 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $689,286
  • East Bradford Township: 12 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $680,504
  • East Goshen Township: 15 Transactions, Average Sold Price: $676,190

🏘️ Market Performance by Township & Subdivision (Average Sold Price)

Thornbury Township – Average $932,850

  • PRESERVE AT SQUIRE CHEYNEY FARM: $1,300,000 (1 Sale)
  • GLEN MILLS: $1,275,000 (1 Sale)
  • CRICKLEWOOD: $1,189,000 (1 Sale)
  • TALL TREES AT THOR: $1,080,000 (1 Sale)
  • DILWORTHTOWN WOODS: $910,000 (1 Sale)
  • CHERRY CREEK: $878,300 (3 Sales)
  • Individual Homes: $830,750 (4 Sales)

West Goshen Township – Average $902,657

  • GREYSTONE: $1,154,786 (10 Sales)
  • ARBOURS AT W GOSHEN: $815,000 (1 Sale)
  • IDLEWILDE: $745,000 (1 Sale)
  • FALCONCREST: $670,000 (1 Sale)
  • Individual Homes: $634,043 (3 Sales)
  • MERIWEATHER FARMS: $585,500 (1 Sale)

West Chester Borough – Average $819,239

  • WEST CHESTER: $1,500,000 (1 Sale)
  • Individual Homes: $1,195,791 (3 Sales)
  • HIGHPNTE AT SHANAHAN: $682,500 (2 Sales)
  • WEST CHESTER BORO: $616,000 (3 Sales)
  • WALDEN WOODS: $545,500 (1 Sale)

West Whiteland Township – Average $818,515

  • SWEDESFORD CHASE: $1,315,000 (1 Sale)
  • KIRKLAND MANOR: $1,191,850 (2 Sales)
  • EXTON WALK SINGLES: $1,186,528 (6 Sales)
  • WALTZ LEA: $999,000 (1 Sale)
  • Individual Homes: $711,667 (3 Sales)
  • EXTON STATION: $377,500 (2 Sales)

Westtown Township – Average $689,286

  • SAWMILL COURT: $1,050,000 (1 Sale)
  • PENNWOOD: $900,000 (1 Sale)
  • WEDGEWOOD ESTATES: $790,000 (1 Sale)
  • WEST WYNN: $574,999 (1 Sale)
  • WESTVIEW ACRES: $560,000 (1 Sale)

East Bradford Township – Average $680,504

  • EAST BRADFORD TWP: $1,575,000 (1 Sale)
  • RADLEY RUN IV: $1,175,000 (1 Sale)
  • Individual Homes: $749,900 (1 Sale)
  • BRADFORD CHASE: $731,250 (1 Sale)
  • WEST CHESTER CROSSING: $715,000 (1 Sale)
  • PARK PLACE: $525,000 (1 Sale)
  • RADLEY RUN MEWS: $519,667 (3 Sales)

East Goshen Township – Average $676,190

  • LOCKWOOD CHASE: $970,000 (1 Sale)
  • Individual Homes: $901,667 (3 Sales)
  • MARYDELL FARMS: $895,000 (1 Sale)
  • BOW TREE: $865,000 (1 Sale)
  • HERSHEYS MILL: $575,025 (4 Sales)

🧭 Summary & Outlook

The West Chester Area School District market continues to demonstrate intense demand and price appreciation, with median sold prices jumping nearly $100,000 from September to October. While the volume of sales decreased slightly, the speed of the market (Median CDOM of 7 days) and the perfect 100% median sale-to-list price ratio confirms this is still a strong seller's environment.

  • For Buyers: Preparation is key. Despite 62 price reductions offering some opportunity, strong, clean offers are necessary for move-in-ready homes in top subdivisions.
  • For Sellers: The WCASD is peaking in price, particularly for single-family homes in premier townships like Thornbury and West Goshen. A strategic, market-correct price point will likely result in quick sales and strong returns.

Stay Connected

✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends!

Explore other October 2025 Market Reports:

Data Disclaimer & Disclosure

All information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. All data and statistics are provided by Bright MLS for the period of October 2025.

The Broker makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data, whether collected directly or provided by Bright MLS or its participants. This information is subject to errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, including, but not limited to, those from data entry.

This report does not account for off-market transactions, private sales, or transactions conducted outside of Bright MLS. This report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as real estate advice. Since individual circumstances vary, all real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular needs.

Coatesville Area School District October 2025 Residential Real Estate Market Update Graph

October 2025 Coatesville Area School District Residential Real Estate Market Update

November 19, 2025

Welcome to the Trago Realty market update for the Coatesville Area School District (CASD) service area. This report summarizes residential sales activity within the various municipalities of the CASD during October 2025.

Last month, the market experienced increased activity with the number of transactions rising. However, key pricing metrics softened, and properties spent a few more days on the market, signaling a shift toward more balanced conditions compared to the intensely competitive summer months.

📊 Quick Market Snapshot – October 2025

  • On-Market Transactions: 69 Closed Sales (Up from 65 in September 2025)
  • Median Sold Price: $335,000 (Down from $405,000 in September 2025)
  • Average Sold Price: $441,463 (Up from $390,363 in September 2025)
  • Median Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM): 14 days (Up from 12 days in September 2025)
  • Average Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM): 31 days (Up from 29 days in September 2025)
  • Sale Price-to-Original List Price Ratio: 96.90% (Down from 99.17% in September 2025)

🔑 Market Insights: Price and Velocity

October saw a notable decrease in the Median Sold Price (down $70,000 to $335,000) compared to September, suggesting a higher volume of transactions occurred at lower price points this month.

Simultaneously, the Sale Price-to-Original List Price Ratio dropped significantly to 96.90%. This is a major indicator that buyers were able to negotiate more effectively, and aggressive initial pricing by sellers is becoming less effective. The market is shifting away from automatic bidding wars toward a more traditional negotiating environment.

The average time it takes to sell a home increased slightly, with the Median CDOM moving from 12 to 14 days, reinforcing the trend toward cooling demand. For sellers, this means careful pricing is paramount, as evidenced by the 37 price reductions observed this month, averaging a 6.45% reduction from the original list price.

Financing Snapshot:

Conventional loans remain the dominant financing type. The most significant shift is the reduction in Cash transactions, which dropped from nearly one-in-four sales in September to just 14.49% in October. This reduction in cash competition may be contributing to the improved negotiability for financed buyers (lower Sale Price-to-Original Price Ratio).

  • Conventional: 43 units (62.32%)
  • Cash: 10 units (14.49%)
  • FHA: 7 units (10.14%)
  • VA: 5 units (7.25%)
  • Other/Minor Financing Types: 4 units (5.80%) (Includes Adjustable Rate Mortgage, PHFA, Installment Sale, and Other)

🏡 Market Performance by Township

The Coatesville Area School District features a diverse range of price points across its various municipalities.

  • West Brandywine Township: 9 Transactions, Median Sold Price: $466,500
  • Caln Township: 11 Transactions, Median Sold Price: $444,900
  • West Caln Township: 5 Transactions, Median Sold Price: $385,000
  • East Fallowfield Township: 12 Transactions, Median Sold Price: $372,500
  • South Coatesville Borough: 3 Transactions, Median Sold Price: $340,000
  • Sadsbury Township: 5 Transactions, Median Sold Price: $324,999
  • Valley Township: 13 Transactions, Median Sold Price: $317,500
  • Modena Borough: 1 Transaction, Median Sold Price: $277,000
  • Parkesburg Borough: 1 Transaction, Median Sold Price: $262,000
  • Coatesville City: 9 Transactions, Median Sold Price: $160,000

Highest Median Price Points: West Brandywine and Caln Townships continue to command the highest median prices, maintaining their status as the premium markets within the CASD service area.

Volume Leaders: Valley Township (13 units), East Fallowfield Township (12 units), and Caln Township (11 units) drove the majority of the transaction volume this month.

🏘️ Market Performance by Township & Subdivision

Below is a breakdown of performance by municipality, ranked from highest to lowest median sold price. The values listed for each subdivision represent the average sold price for October 2025.

West Brandywine Township – Average $458,425

  • TRADITIONS OF AMERICA AT WEST BRANDYWINE: $665,000 (1 Sale)
  • LANMARK FARMS: $600,000 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $513,250 (2 Sales)
  • RESERVE AT CROSS CREEK: $447,162 (2 Sales)
  • BROOKFIELD: $415,000 (1 Sale)
  • WOODBROOKE: $350,000 (1 Sale)
  • WEST BRANDYWINE TWP: $175,000 (1 Sale)

Caln Township – Average $401,140

  • RESERVE AT BAILEY ST: $535,000 (1 Sale)
  • CROSSING AT BAILEY S: $525,000 (1 Sale)
  • DOWNING FORGE: $500,000 (1 Sale)
  • THORNDALE WOODS: $457,740 (1 Sale)
  • BARLEY GREENS: $444,900 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $334,000 (5 Sales)
  • PARKSIDE: $279,900 (1 Sale)

West Caln Township – Average $398,400

  • SANDY HILL: $550,000 (1 Sale)
  • SUNSET HILLS: $385,000 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $352,333 (3 Sales)

Sadsbury Township – Average $354,160

  • SADSBURY PARK: $560,000 (1 Sale)
  • QUARRY RIDGE: $479,900 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $287,500 (2 Sales)
  • LINCOLN CREST MHP: $155,900 (1 Sale)

East Fallowfield Township – Average $349,075

  • STONE CREEK: $615,000 (1 Sale)
  • FALLOWFIELD FARMS: $445,000 (1 Sale)
  • BROOK CROSSING: $432,500 (2 Sales)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $398,250 (4 Sales)
  • COATESVILLE: $260,000 (1 Sale)
  • EAST FALLOWFIELD: $198,000 (1 Sale)
  • HIDDEN VALLEY ESTATES: $119,900 (1 Sale)
  • BRANFORD VILLAGE: $93,000 (1 Sale)

South Coatesville Borough – Average $346,667

  • Unspecified Subdivision: $375,000 (1 Sale)
  • SOUTHVIEW: $332,500 (2 Sales)

Valley Township – Average $312,792

  • VILLAGES AT HILLVIEW: $390,000 (4 Sales)
  • VALLEY SQUARE TOWNS: $325,000 (1 Sale)
  • HAYTI: $317,500 (1 Sale)
  • BEACON HILL: $315,000 (1 Sale)
  • ELMWOOD GARDENS: $305,000 (1 Sale)
  • TIMBERLANE: $289,900 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $278,000 (3 Sales)
  • TAYLOR MHP: $119,900 (1 Sale)

Modena Borough – Average $277,000

  • APPLEWOOD: $277,000 (1 Sale)

Parkesburg Borough – Average $262,000

  • POMEROY: $262,000 (1 Sale)

Coatesville City – Average $173,000

  • PENN CROSSING: $215,000 (1 Sale)
  • Unspecified Subdivision: $167,750 (8 Sales)

Stay Connected

✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends!

Explore other October 2025 Market Reports:

Disclaimer & Disclosure

All information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. All data and statistics are provided by Bright MLS for the period of October 2025.

The Broker makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data, whether collected directly or provided by Bright MLS or its participants. This information is subject to errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, including, but not limited to, those from data entry.

This report does not account for off-market transactions, private sales, or transactions conducted outside of Bright MLS. This report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as real estate advice. Since individual circumstances vary, all real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular needs.

Chester County September 2025 Residential Real Estate Market Update Graph

September 2025 Chester County, PA Residential Real Estate Market Update

October 14, 2025

Quick Market Snapshot: September 2025

  • Months Supply of Inventory: 3 months
  • Average Days on Market: 26 days
  • Sale Price-to-Original Price Ratio (SP/OP): 100% (Median) & 110.26% (Average)

Market Insights: September 2025 Chester County Real Estate Report

Key Market Metrics:

  • Current Price Average: $830,321
  • Current Price Median: $599,490
  • Days to Sell Average: 24 days
  • Days to Sell Median: 9 days
  • Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM) Average: 26 days
  • Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM) Median: 9 days
  • Number of Price Reductions: 328
  • Median Percentage Price Reduction: 4.55%
  • Number of Closed Sales: 496

Comparison to August 2025

Comparing September’s performance to August 2025 reveals distinct shifts in the market's trajectory:

  • Closed Sales Volume: Sales fell from 583 units in August to 496 units in September (a decrease of 87 sales). This is a strong indicator of seasonal slowing.
  • Inventory Expansion: Months Supply of Inventory increased to 3 months (up from 2 months in August).]
  • Price Stability: The Median Sale Price remained highly stable at $599,490, only a $490 increase from August’s $599,000, suggesting market values are holding firm.
  • Market Pace: Both average and median days on market saw a modest increase. CDOM Average increased to 26 days (up from 24 days in August), confirming that market velocity has cooled slightly.
  • Price Adjustments: The number of price reductions notably increased to 328 (up from 263 in August), an additional sign that sellers are actively adjusting expectations.

Mortgage & Payment Types (September 2025):

Financing trends highlight the stability of the local buyer pool, heavily favoring traditional loans and cash:

  • Conventional: 64.11%
  • Cash: 28.23%
  • FHA: 2.82%
  • VA: 1.81%
  • PHFA: 0.81%
  • Cash, Conventional (Blended): 0.60%
  • Adjustable Rate Mortgage (ARM): 0.60%
  • Other (Includes Seller, Private, Farm Credit, Income Qualified): 0.82%

September 2025 Chester County by School District: Summary Data

Here is a summary breakdown of residential real estate activity across Chester County's school districts for September 2025, detailing closed sales volume and the typical home value (Median Sold Price):

  • West Chester Area: 107 sales | Median Sold Price: $645,000
  • Coatesville Area: 65 sales | Median Sold Price: $405,000
  • Downingtown Area: 61 sales | Median Sold Price: $585,000
  • Tredyffrin-Easttown: 46 sales | Median Sold Price: $772,500
  • Phoenixville Area: 43 sales | Median Sold Price: $480,000
  • Kennett Consolidated: 33 sales | Median Sold Price: $660,000
  • Owen J Roberts: 31 sales | Median Sold Price: $570,000
  • Great Valley: 27 sales | Median Sold Price: $735,000
  • Avon Grove: 19 sales | Median Sold Price: $565,000
  • Oxford Area: 19 sales | Median Sold Price: $520,000
  • Octorara Area: 16 sales | Median Sold Price: $405,000
  • Twin Valley: 14 sales | Median Sold Price: $397,500
  • Unionville-Chadds Ford: 13 sales | Median Sold Price: $940,000
  • Spring Ford Area: 2 sales | Median Sold Price: $259,612

September 2025 Residential Sales by School District and Township:

This breakdown provides a detailed, localized view of sales activity and median pricing across Chester County’s municipalities that make-up each school district area:

AVON GROVE (19 units total)

  • Franklin Township: 7 units, Median Sold Price $627,110
  • New London Township: 2 units, Median Sold Price $607,450
  • Penn Township: 3 units, Median Sold Price $550,000
  • London Grove Township: 4 units, Median Sold Price $391,000
  • Avondale Borough: 1 unit, Median Sold Price $350,000
  • London Britain Township: 2 units, Median Sold Price $1,030,000

COATESVILLE AREA (65 units total)

  • Caln Township: 21 units, Median Sold Price $405,000
  • West Brandywine Township: 6 units, Median Sold Price $483,750
  • West Caln Township: 6 units, Median Sold Price $456,450
  • East Fallowfield Township: 7 units, Median Sold Price $430,000
  • Valley Township: 16 units, Median Sold Price $385,000
  • South Coatesville Borough: 1 unit, Median Sold Price $339,990
  • Sadsbury Township: 1 unit, Median Sold Price $280,000
  • Coatesville City: 6 units, Median Sold Price $214,750
  • Modena Borough: 1 unit, Median Sold Price $210,000

DOWNINGTOWN AREA (61 units total)

  • Upper Uwchlan Township: 7 units, Median Sold Price $725,000
  • West Bradford Township: 8 units, Median Sold Price $685,001
  • West Pikeland Township: 4 units, Median Sold Price $614,000
  • East Brandywine Township: 10 units, Median Sold Price $531,750
  • Uwchlan Township: 17 units, Median Sold Price $475,000
  • Downingtown Borough: 8 units, Median Sold Price $407,500
  • East Caln Township: 2 units, Median Sold Price $405,000
  • Wallace Township: 5 units, Median Sold Price $1,340,580

GREAT VALLEY (27 units total)

  • East Whiteland Township: 7 units, Median Sold Price $855,000
  • Willistown Township: 9 units, Median Sold Price $830,000
  • Malvern Borough: 4 units, Median Sold Price $718,108
  • Charlestown Township: 7 units, Median Sold Price $548,900

KENNETT CONSOLIDATED (33 units total)

  • East Marlboro Township: 7 units, Median Sold Price $805,000
  • New Garden Township: 11 units, Median Sold Price $660,000
  • Kennett Township: 10 units, Median Sold Price $575,000
  • Kennett Square Borough: 5 units, Median Sold Price $475,000

OCTORARA AREA (16 units total)

  • Highland Township: 2 units, Median Sold Price $582,000
  • Londonderry Township: 3 units, Median Sold Price $543,795
  • West Fallowfield Township: 5 units, Median Sold Price $445,000
  • Atglen Borough: 2 units, Median Sold Price $340,000
  • West Sadsbury Township: 2 units, Median Sold Price $320,000
  • Parkesburg Borough: 2 units, Median Sold Price $270,000

OWEN J ROBERTS (31 units total)

  • West Vincent Township: 5 units, Median Sold Price $725,000
  • South Coventry Township: 2 units, Median Sold Price $627,500
  • East Vincent Township: 5 units, Median Sold Price $620,000
  • East Coventry Township: 7 units, Median Sold Price $577,000
  • East Nantmeal Township: 1 unit, Median Sold Price $535,000
  • Warwick Township: 4 units, Median Sold Price $522,500
  • North Coventry Township: 7 units, Median Sold Price $375,000

OXFORD AREA (19 units total)

  • East Nottingham Township: 9 units, Median Sold Price $613,000
  • Lower Oxford Township: 2 units, Median Sold Price $577,450
  • Oxford Borough: 3 units, Median Sold Price $475,000
  • West Nottingham Township: 3 units, Median Sold Price $410,000
  • Upper Oxford Township: 2 units, Median Sold Price $386,000

PHOENIXVILLE AREA (43 units total)

  • East Pikeland Township: 13 units, Median Sold Price $620,000
  • Schuylkill Township: 5 units, Median Sold Price $590,000
  • Phoenixville Borough: 25 units, Median Sold Price $406,000

SPRING FORD AREA (2 units total)

  • Spring City Borough: 2 units, Median Sold Price $259,612

TREDYFFRIN-EASTTOWN (46 units total)

  • Easttown Township: 9 units, Median Sold Price $1,100,000
  • Tredyffrin Township: 37 units, Median Sold Price $690,000

TWIN VALLEY (14 units total)

  • Honeybrook Township: 10 units, Median Sold Price $456,000
  • Elverson Borough: 2 units, Median Sold Price $434,500
  • West Nantmeal Township: 1 unit, Median Sold Price $111,000
  • Honeybrook Borough: 1 unit, Median Sold Price $85,000

UNIONVILLE-CHADDS FORD (13 units total)

  • Pocopson Township: 1 unit, Median Sold Price $1,175,000
  • Birmingham Township: 7 units, Median Sold Price $950,000
  • Newlin Township: 1 unit, Median Sold Price $900,000
  • Pennsbury Township: 4 units, Median Sold Price $862,500

WEST CHESTER AREA (107 units total)

  • East Bradford Township: 10 units, Median Sold Price $987,500
  • Thornbury Township: 4 units, Median Sold Price $1,150,000
  • West Goshen Township: 21 units, Median Sold Price $750,000
  • Westtown Township: 8 units, Median Sold Price $667,500
  • East Goshen Township: 24 units, Median Sold Price $564,000
  • West Chester Borough: 16 units, Median Sold Price $556,250
  • West Whiteland Township: 24 units, Median Sold Price $498,750

Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions or would like a more detailed analysis of specific areas.

If you like what you see...

✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends!

✅ Explore other September 2025 Market Reports:

Data Disclaimer & Disclosure

All information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness.

All data and statistics are provided by Bright MLS for the period of September 2025.

The Broker makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data, whether collected directly or provided by Bright MLS or its participants. This information is subject to errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, including, but not limited to, those from data entry.

Additionally, this report does not account for off-market transactions, private sales, or transactions conducted outside of Bright MLS.

This report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as real estate advice. Since individual circumstances vary, all real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular needs.

Chester County September 2025 Residential Real Estate Rental Market Update Graph

September 2025 Chester County Residential Rental Market Update

October 14, 2025

Quick Market Snapshot

  • Total Units Leased: 154
  • Countywide Rents: Average: $2,449 & Median: $2,325
  • Sale Price-to-Original Price Ratio: Average: 98.72% & Median: 100.00%
  • Days on Market (CDOM): Average: 42 & Median: 28

By comparison, August reported a similar pace, with just a slight decrease in total rental volume.
Median rents remained relatively consistent across most districts, with subtle movement among mid- and upper-tier submarkets.

Countywide Overview – September 2025

Metric Chester County MoM Change (vs. Aug 2025)

  • Total Units Leased 154 ↓ from 162
  • Median Rent $2,325 ≈ Stable
  • Median SP/OP Ratio 100.00% ≈ Stable
  • Median Days on Market 28 ↑ slightly (from 26)

School District Performance

School District Overview

Highlights:

Great Valley and Downingtown Area continued to lead the mid-tier suburban markets in both rent price and leasing activity.

Tredyffrin-Easttown maintained the shortest market time (median 14 days), reflecting steady tenant demand.

  • Octorara and Unionville-Chadds Ford reported the highest median rents, both above $4,000, though on low sample counts.
  • Octorara Area – 1 unit – Median Rent: $4,500 – SP/OP: 100.00% – CDOM: 56
  • Twin Valley – 1 unit – Median Rent: $3,250 – SP/OP: 92.86% – CDOM: 42
  • Great Valley – 14 units – Median Rent: $3,175 – SP/OP: 100.00% – CDOM: 26
  • Owen J. Roberts – 4 units – Median Rent: $2,900 – SP/OP: 100.00% – CDOM: 23
  • Downingtown Area – 22 units – Median Rent: $2,850 – SP/OP: 100.00% – CDOM: 33
  • Unionville-Chadds Ford – 2 units – Median Rent: $2,843 – SP/OP: 98.02% – CDOM: 70
  • Avon Grove – 2 units – Median Rent: $2,625 – SP/OP: 100.00% – CDOM: 28
  • Kennett Consolidated – 12 units – Median Rent: $2,375 – SP/OP: 100.00% – CDOM: 24
  • West Chester Area – 23 units – Median Rent: $2,350 – SP/OP: 100.00% – CDOM: 33
  • Tredyffrin-Easttown – 16 units – Median Rent: $2,200 – SP/OP: 100.00% – CDOM: 14
  • Phoenixville Area – 35 units – Median Rent: $2,165 – SP/OP: 100.00% – CDOM: 29
  • Spring-Ford Area – 5 units – Median Rent: $2,100 – SP/OP: 100.00% – CDOM: 27
  • Coatesville Area – 14 units – Median Rent: $2,050 – SP/OP: 100.00% – CDOM: 22
  • Oxford Area – 3 units – Median Rent: $2,000 – SP/OP: 100.00% – CDOM: 17

School District-to-Township Breakdown

Below are the average rental prices by township within each major school district, reflecting localized variations within district boundaries.

Township Breakdown by School District – Averages

Avon Grove (2 units, Avg Sold Price $2,625)

  • New London Township – 1 unit – $3,550
  • Franklin Township – 1 unit – $1,700

Coatesville Area (14 units, Avg Sold Price $1,960)

  • Valley Township – 1 unit – $2,550
  • Caln Township – 3 units – $2,315
  • Sadsbury Township – 1 unit – $2,200
  • West Caln Township – 3 units – $2,000
  • Coatesville City – 5 units – $1,680
  • West Brandywine Township – 1 unit – $1,350

Downingtown Area (22 units, Avg Sold Price $2,737)

  • West Bradford Township – 1 unit – $4,000
  • Upper Uwchlan Township – 3 units – $3,500
  • East Caln Township – 1 unit – $3,250
  • Uwchlan Township – 5 units – $2,647
  • East Brandywine Township – 3 units – $2,500
  • Downingtown Borough – 9 units – $2,413

Great Valley (14 units, Avg Sold Price $3,185)

  • East Whiteland Township – 6 units – $3,633
  • Willistown Township – 6 units – $3,225
  • Charlestown Township – 1 unit – $1,745
  • Malvern Borough – 1 unit – $1,700

Kennett Consolidated (12 units, Avg Sold Price $2,329)

  • Kennett Township – 4 units – $2,999
  • East Marlboro Township – 4 units – $2,188
  • New Garden Township – 1 unit – $1,800
  • Kennett Square Borough – 3 units – $1,800

Octorara Area (1 unit, Avg Sold Price $4,500)

  • Highland Township – 1 unit – $4,500

Owen J. Roberts (4 units, Avg Sold Price $2,900)

  • West Vincent Township – 1 unit – $4,600
  • South Coventry Township – 1 unit – $3,000
  • East Coventry Township – 2 units – $2,000

Oxford Area (3 units, Avg Sold Price $1,883)

  • Upper Oxford Township – 1 unit – $2,150
  • East Nottingham Township – 1 unit – $2,000
  • Oxford Borough – 1 unit – $1,500

Phoenixville Area (35 units, Avg Sold Price $2,260)

  • Schuylkill Township – 1 unit – $3,200
  • East Pikeland Township – 4 units – $2,488
  • Phoenixville Borough – 30 units – $2,199

Spring Ford Area (5 units, Avg Sold Price $1,999)

  • Spring City Borough – 5 units – $1,999

Tredyffrin-Easttown (16 units, Avg Sold Price $2,264)

  • Easttown Township – 3 units – $3,217
  • Tredyffrin Township – 13 units – $2,044

Twin Valley (1 unit, Avg Sold Price $3,250)

  • Elverson Borough – 1 unit – $3,250

Unionville-Chadds Ford (2 units, Avg Sold Price $2,843)

  • Pocopson Township – 1 unit – $3,500
  • Pennsbury Township – 1 unit – $2,185

West Chester Area (23 units, Avg Sold Price $2,420)

  • East Bradford Township – 1 unit – $2,700
  • West Goshen Township – 3 units – $2,500
  • West Whiteland Township – 3 units – $2,415
  • West Chester Borough – 15 units – $2,402
  • Westtown Township – 1 unit – $2,175

Bedroom-Level Analysis

Avon Grove (2 units)

  • 3 Bedrooms – 1 unit – $1,700 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 11
  • 4 Bedrooms – 1 unit – $3,550 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 45

Coatesville Area (14 units)

  • 1 Bedroom – 2 units – $1,250 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 20
  • 2 Bedrooms – 2 units – $1,600 – SP/OP 108% – CDOM 20
  • 3 Bedrooms – 7 units – $2,250 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 63
  • 4 Bedrooms – 3 units – $2,000 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 6

Downingtown Area (22 units)

  • 1 Bedroom – 2 units – $1,438 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 33
  • 2 Bedrooms – 4 units – $1,748 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 21
  • 3 Bedrooms – 11 units – $2,950 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 35
  • 4 Bedrooms – 2 units – $2,800 – SP/OP 98.23% – CDOM 39
  • 5 Bedrooms – 3 units – $3,500 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 26

Great Valley (14 units)

  • 2 Bedrooms – 2 units – $1,723 – SP/OP 91.95% – CDOM 66
  • 3 Bedrooms – 10 units – $3,225 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 31
  • 4 Bedrooms – 2 units – $4,000 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 17

Kennett Consolidated (12 units)

  • 1 Bedroom – 2 units – $1,575 – SP/OP 101.28% – CDOM 19
  • 2 Bedrooms – 3 units – $1,800 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 23
  • 3 Bedrooms – 7 units – $2,700 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 35

Owen J. Roberts (4 units)

  • 1 Bedroom – 1 unit – $1,200 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 7
  • 3 Bedrooms – 2 units – $2,900 – SP/OP 100.42% – CDOM 75
  • 5 Bedrooms – 1 unit – $4,600 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 17

Oxford Area (3 units)

  • 2 Bedrooms – 1 unit – $1,500 – SP/OP 88.24% – CDOM 87
  • 3 Bedrooms – 2 units – $2,075 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 14

Phoenixville Area (35 units)

  • Studio – 1 unit – $1,200 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 24
  • 1 Bedroom – 19 units – $1,978 – SP/OP 100.25% – CDOM 28
  • 2 Bedrooms – 10 units – $2,595 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 37
  • 3 Bedrooms – 4 units – $2,800 – SP/OP 95.65% – CDOM 34
  • 4 Bedrooms – 1 unit – $2,800 – SP/OP 93.33% – CDOM 46

Spring Ford Area (5 units)

  • 1 Bedroom – 2 units – $1,298 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 12
  • 2 Bedrooms – 1 unit – $2,100 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 39
  • 3 Bedrooms – 2 units – $2,650 – SP/OP 99.57% – CDOM 34

Tredyffrin-Easttown (16 units)

  • Studio – 1 unit – $875 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 5
  • 1 Bedroom – 2 units – $1,525 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 14
  • 2 Bedrooms – 7 units – $2,200 – SP/OP 95% – CDOM 17
  • 3 Bedrooms – 6 units – $2,275 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 14

Twin Valley (1 unit)

  • 3 Bedrooms – 1 unit – $3,250 – SP/OP 92.86% – CDOM 42

Unionville-Chadds Ford (2 units)

  • 2 Bedrooms – 1 unit – $2,185 – SP/OP 96.04% – CDOM 130
  • 3 Bedrooms – 1 unit – $3,500 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 10

West Chester Area (23 units)

  • 1 Bedroom – 5 units – $1,750 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 32
  • 2 Bedrooms – 7 units – $1,895 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 33
  • 3 Bedrooms – 8 units – $3,025 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 30
  • 4 Bedrooms – 2 units – $2,873 – SP/OP 96.29% – CDOM 53
  • 5 Bedrooms – 1 unit – $3,450 – SP/OP 100% – CDOM 42

Observations:

  • Most school districts maintained 100% median SP/OP ratios, underscoring minimal negotiation at lease signing.
  • The 3-bedroom segment remains the most active and representative unit type across nearly every district.
  • Owen J. Roberts and Downingtown Area reported the highest median rents for larger homes (4–5 bedrooms), consistent with August trends.

Summary

September’s Chester County rental market maintained a consistent pricing structure compared to August, with flat median rents and steady turnover times across nearly all school districts.
Township-level performance highlights notable diversity in pricing, from urban centers like Phoenixville Borough ($2,199) to more rural enclaves such as West Vincent Township ($4,600).

Tenant activity remains strong, particularly in 3-bedroom and 4-bedroom segments, while shorter cumulative days on market readings in districts like Tredyffrin-Easttown and Kennett Consolidated reflect efficient leasing velocity.

Stay Connected

✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends:
✅ Explore other September 2025 Market Reports:

Data Disclaimer & Disclosure

All information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness.

All data and statistics are provided by Bright MLS for the period of September 2025.

The Broker makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data, whether collected directly or provided by Bright MLS or its participants. This information is subject to errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, including, but not limited to, those from data entry.

Additionally, this report does not account for off-market transactions, private sales, or transactions conducted outside of Bright MLS.

This report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as real estate advice. Since individual circumstances vary, all real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular needs.

Downingtown Area School District September 2025 Residential Real Estate Market Update Graph

September 2025 Downingtown Area School District Residential Real Estate Market Update

October 10, 2025

📊 Quick Market Snapshot — September 2025

Downingtown Area School District Real Estate Market

  • On-Market Residential Transactions Sold: 61

Median / Average

  • Sold Price: $585,000 / $646,101
  • Cumulative Days on Market: 7 / 24
  • Sold Price-to-Original Price Ratio: 100.00% / 102.06%

Financing Snapshot:

  • Conventional – 43 (70.49%)
  • Cash – 14 (22.95%)
  • FHA – 2 (3.28%)
  • PHFA – 2 (3.28%)

Conventional financing continues to lead the market, with nearly a quarter of transactions closing in cash — a sign of strong buyer competition and limited inventory across the district.

🏡 Market Performance by Township
Below is a breakdown of median sold prices by township in the Downingtown Area School District, ranked from highest to lowest, with the number of sales in parentheses:

  • Wallace Township – $1,340,580 (5 Sales)
  • Upper Uwchlan Township – $725,000 (7 Sales)
  • West Bradford Township – $685,001 (8 Sales)
  • West Pikeland Township – $614,000 (4 Sales)
  • East Brandywine Township – $531,750 (10 Sales)
  • Uwchlan Township – $475,000 (17 Sales)
  • Downingtown Borough – $407,500 (8 Sales)
  • East Caln Township – $405,000 (2 Sales)

🏡 Market Performance by Township & Subdivision

The Downingtown Area School District includes a wide range of home styles, from established neighborhoods to newer construction communities. Below are median sold prices by subdivision, with the number of sales in parentheses:

Downingtown Borough – Median $407,500

  • Downingtown Common – $440,500 (1)
  • Meadow Woods – $410,000 (1)
  • Main Street Village – $400,000 (1)
  • None Available – $405,000 (5)
  • East Brandywine Township – Median $531,750
  • Applecross – $926,750 (2)
  • Hideaway Farms – $925,000 (1)
  • Hopewell – $730,000 (1)
  • Locust Knolls – $640,000 (1)
  • Mapleview – $460,000 (1)
  • Hedgerow at Culbert – $300,000 (1)
  • Mount Idy Tr Pk – $50,000 (1)
  • None Available – $495,000 (2)

East Caln Township – Median $405,000

  • Woodmont North – $225,000 (1)
  • None Available – $585,000 (1)

Upper Uwchlan Township – Median $725,000

  • Chalfant St Giles – $1,100,000 (1)
  • Woodleigh – $955,000 (1)
  • Twin Pines – $885,000 (1)
  • Byers Station – $725,000 (1)
  • Eagle Manor – $603,000 (1)
  • Marsh Harbour – $602,000 (2)

Uwchlan Township – Median $475,000

  • Williamsburg – $792,000 (1)
  • Arbordayle – $785,000 (2)
  • The Timbers – $750,000 (1)
  • Eagleview – $685,000 (1)
  • Marchwood – $675,000 (1)
  • The Seasons – $659,150 (2)
  • Uwchlan Twp – $475,000 (1)
  • None Available – $450,000 (1)
  • Rhondda – $425,000 (5)
  • Liongate – $393,750 (2)

Wallace Township – Median $1,340,580

  • Glenwood Estates – $1,550,000 (1)
  • Bassett Hunt – $500,000 (1)
  • None Available – $1,340,580 (3)

West Bradford Township – Median $685,001

  • Marshall Hunt – $800,000 (1)
  • Tattersall – $795,000 (1)
  • Stargazer Village – $720,001 (1)
  • Marshallton – $650,000 (1)
  • Brandywine Greene – $400,000 (2)
  • None Available – $953,772 (2)

West Pikeland Township – Median $614,000

  • Pickering Estates – $638,000 (1)
  • Chester Springs – $385,000 (1)
  • None Available – $817,500 (2)

🧭 Summary & Outlook

The September 2025 Downingtown Area School District market reflects ongoing buyer demand and solid pricing stability. Homes continue to sell close to, or above, original list price, with a median of just one week on the market. Sellers benefit from strong negotiating positions, while buyers face limited inventory and a need for quick, decisive offers in high-demand communities.

If you like what you see…
Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends!
🔗 https://www.tragorealty.com/#subscribe

Explore Other Market Reports:

Data Disclaimer & Disclosure

All information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness.

All data and statistics are provided by Bright MLS for the period of September 2025.

The Broker makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data, whether collected directly or provided by Bright MLS or its participants. This information is subject to errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, including, but not limited to, those from data entry.

Additionally, this report does not account for off-market transactions, private sales, or transactions conducted outside of Bright MLS.

This report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as real estate advice. Since individual circumstances vary, all real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular needs.

West Chester Area School District September 2025 Residential Real Estate Market Update Graph

September 2025 West Chester Area School District Residential Real Estate Market Update

October 10, 2025

📊 Quick Market Snapshot September 2025

Coatesville Area School District Real Estate Market

  • On-Market Residential Transactions Sold: 113

Median / Average

  • Sold Price: $654,900 / $740,930
  • Cumulative Days on Market: 6 / 16
  • Sold Price-to-Original Price Ratio: 100% / 99.16%

Financing Snapshot:

  • Conventional – 69 (61.06%)
  • Cash – 35 (30.97%)
  • VA – 3 (2.65%)
  • FHA – 2 (1.77%)
  • Adjustable Rate / Other – 3 (2.65%)
  • Private – 1 (0.88%)

Conventional loans continue to dominate, though nearly one-third of transactions were cash sales, highlighting the competitive market and the challenges for buyers relying on financing.

🏡 Market Performance by Township

Below is a breakdown of median sold prices by township in West Chester Area School District, ranked from highest to lowest, with number of sales in parentheses.

  • Thornbury Township – $1,050,000 (10 Sales)
  • East Bradford Township – $987,500 (10 Sales)
  • West Goshen Township – $750,000 (21 Sales)
  • Westtown Township – $667,500 (8 Sales)
  • East Goshen Township – $564,000 (24 Sales)
  • West Chester Borough – $556,250 (16 Sales)
  • West Whiteland Township – $498,750 (24 Sales)

🏡 Market Performance by Township & Subdivision

The West Chester Area School District features a diverse range of housing price points. The values listed below for each subdivision represent the median sold price, with the number of sales in parentheses.

Thornbury Township – Median $1,050,000

  • Bainbridge – $1,410,000 (1)
  • Andover – $1,350,500 (2)
  • Thornbury Knoll – $1,300,000 (1)
  • Cobblestones at Thornbury – $1,100,000 (1)
  • Thornbury Hunt – $1,000,000 (1)
  • Preserve at Squire Chey – $1,000,000 (1)
  • None Available – $800,000 (2)
  • Thornbury – $782,500 (1)

East Bradford Township – Median $987,500

  • Heritage at Parke FA – $1,650,000 (1)
  • Blue Rock Meadows – $1,577,850 (1)
  • Steeplechase – $1,250,000 (1)
  • Kenmara – $1,050,000 (1)
  • Oermead Farm – $1,035,000 (1)
  • Darlington Ridge – $940,000 (1)
  • West Chester – $815,000 (1)
  • West Chester Crossing – $702,000 (2)
  • None Available – $675,000 (1)

West Goshen Township – Median $750,000

  • Edgewater – $1,600,000 (1)
  • 0 – $1,040,000 (1)
  • Greystone – $1,022,405 (6)
  • Waltz Lea – $885,000 (1)
  • Spring Valley Farm – $771,000 (1)
  • Oak Hill – $750,000 (1)
  • Canterbury – $715,000 (1)
  • Glen Acres – $645,000 (1)
  • Parkchester Estates – $600,000 (1)
  • None Available – $590,000 (6)
  • Suburban Village – $515,000 (1)

Westtown Township – Median $667,500

  • Shiloh Estates – $875,000 (1)
  • Pleasant Grove – $807,000 (1)
  • Westtown Hillside – $710,000 (1)
  • Hummingbird Farm – $625,000 (1)
  • None Available – $560,000 (3)
  • Chesterfield – $465,000 (1)

East Goshen Township – Median $564,000

  • Bow Tree – $1,100,000 (1)
  • Wyllpen Farm – $1,100,000 (1)
  • Hunt Country – $1,025,000 (1)
  • Mill Creek Estates – $971,000 (1)
  • White Chimneys – $950,000 (1)
  • Willow Ponds – $950,000 (1)
  • Grand Oak Run – $855,000 (2)
  • Hersheys Mill – $564,000 (8)
  • Rose Hill Estates – $345,000 (1)
  • Cider Knoll – $255,000 (1)
  • Goshen Valley II – $247,000 (1)
  • Goshen Valley – $222,750 (2)
  • Summit House – $220,000 (3)

West Chester Borough – Median $556,250

  • None Available – $655,000 (8)
  • West Chester – $493,750 (2)
  • West Chester Boro – $474,500 (6)

West Whiteland Township – Median $498,750

  • Exton Walk Singles – $1,268,020 (3)
  • Ryerss Hunt – $875,000 (2)
  • Whiteland Glen – $654,900 (1)
  • Whitford Village – $630,000 (1)
  • Whiteland Woods – $620,000 (1)
  • Whitford Hills – $605,000 (1)
  • Whiteland Hills – $575,000 (1)
  • Lochiel Farm – $570,000 (1)
  • None Available – $497,500 (3)
  • Valley View – $495,000 (1)
  • Fox Run – $465,000 (1)
  • Exton Station – $435,000 (3)
  • Lynetree – $429,500 (2)
  • Highland Glen – $425,000 (1)
  • Whiteland Crest – $405,000 (1)
  • Indian King – $375,000 (1)

🧭 Summary & Outlook

The September 2025 West Chester Area School District market shows strong demand and stable median pricing.

Sellers should continue focusing on strategic pricing, marketing, and presentation, while buyers must be prepared for competitive bidding, especially in high-demand neighborhoods.

If you like what you see…
✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends!

✅ Explore other Market Reports:

Data Disclaimer & Disclosure

All information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness.

All data and statistics are provided by Bright MLS for the period of September 2025.

The Broker makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data, whether collected directly or provided by Bright MLS or its participants. This information is subject to errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, including, but not limited to, those from data entry.

Additionally, this report does not account for off-market transactions, private sales, or transactions conducted outside of Bright MLS.

This report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as real estate advice. Since individual circumstances vary, all real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular needs.

Coatesville Area School District September 2025 Residential Real Estate Market Update Graph

September 2025 Coatesville Area School District Residential Real Estate Market Update

October 9, 2025

📊 Quick Market Snapshot – September 2025

Coatesville Area School District Real Estate Market

  • On-Market Residential Transactions: 65

Median Values:

  • Sold Price: $405,000
  • Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM): 12
  • Sale Price-to-Original List Price Ratio: 100%

Average Values:

  • Sold Price: $390,363
  • Cumulative Days on Market (CDOM): 29
  • Sale Price-to-Original List Price Ratio: 99.17%

Financing Snapshot:

  • Conventional: 60.00%
  • Cash: 23.08%
  • FHA: 9.23%
  • PHFA: 3.08%
  • VA: 1.54%
  • ARM / Farm Credit: 3.08% (combined)

Conventional loans dominate the market, but the high share of cash transactions (nearly one in four) highlights that buyers relying on lower down payment options may face stiff competition.

🏡 Market Performance by Township

Coatesville Area School District – Median Sold Price by Township:

  • $483,750 – West Brandywine Township (6 Units)
  • $456,450 – West Caln Township (6 Units)
  • $430,000 – East Fallowfield Township (7 Units)
  • $405,000 – Caln Township (21 Units)
  • $385,000 – Valley Township (16 Units)
  • $339,990 – South Coatesville Borough (1 Unit)
  • $280,000 – Sadsbury Township (1 Unit)
  • $214,750 – Coatesville City (6 Units)
  • $210,000 – Modena Borough (1 Unit)

🏡 Market Performance by Township & Subdivision

The Coatesville Area School District features a widespread range of price points.

Below is a breakdown of performance by municipality, ranked from highest to lowest median sold price, with advertised subdivisions included. The values listed for each subdivision represent the median sold price. Please note that subdivision names are typically entered manually by the listing agents; as such, this information, like all MLS data, may contain inaccuracies or inconsistencies.

West Brandywine Township – Median $483,750

  • Subdivisions: (No individual subdivisions reported this month)

West Caln Township – Median $456,450

  • Subdivisions:
  • Reserve at Cross Creek – $509,517 (1 Sale)
  • Oak Leaf Forest – $500,000 (1 Sale)
  • None Available – $463,000 (3 Sales)

East Fallowfield Township – Median $430,000

  • Subdivisions:
  • Brinton Station – $512,500 (2 Sales)
  • Providence Hill – $500,000 (1 Sale)
  • None Available – $430,000 (1 Sale)
  • Doe Run / Doe Run Farms I – $395,000 (2 Sales)
  • Manchester Farms – $349,500 (1 Sale)

Caln Township – Median $405,000

  • Subdivisions:
  • Woods at Edges Mill – $604,000 (2 Sales)
  • Downing Forge – $600,000 (1 Sale)
  • Reserve at Bailey Street – $519,000 (1 Sale)
  • Hillview – $485,000 (1 Sale)
  • Ingleside Village – $478,000 (1 Sale)
  • The Woods at Rock Raymond – $450,000 (2 Sales)
  • Coatesville Boro (Caln section) – $450,000 (1 Sale)
  • Thorndale – $444,900 (1 Sale)
  • Downing Ridge – $405,000 (1 Sale)
  • Mews at Bailey Station – $375,000 (1 Sale)
  • Caln Township (general) – $350,000 (1 Sale)
  • Beaver Run Knoll – $334,500 (3 Sales)
  • Barley Sheaf – $305,300 (1 Sale)
  • None Available – $292,500 (2 Sales)
  • Caln (unspecified) – $280,000 (1 Sale)
  • Caln Crest – $210,000 (1 Sale)

Valley Township – Median $385,000

  • Subdivisions:
  • Villages at Hillview – $471,800 (6 Sales)
  • Coatesville (Valley section) – $435,000 (1 Sale)
  • Meadowbrook – $430,000 (1 Sale)
  • Beacon Hill – $370,000 (1 Sale)
  • Round Hill – $335,000 (1 Sale)
  • Spring Brook Village – $310,000 (1 Sale)
  • None Available – $310,000 (4 Sales)
  • Valley Crossing – $305,000 (1 Sale)

South Coatesville Borough – Median $339,990

  • Subdivisions: None Available – $339,990 (1 Sale)

Sadsbury Township – Median $280,000

  • Subdivisions: Pomeroy Heights – $280,000 (1 Sale)

Coatesville City – Median $214,750

  • Subdivisions:
  • None Available – $244,000 (4 Sales)
  • Coatesville (City section) – $202,250 (2 Sales)

Modena Borough – Median $210,000

  • Subdivisions: Bishop Woods – $210,000 (1 Sale)

Stay Connected

✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends:
✅ Explore other September 2025 Market Reports:
  • September 2025 Chester County Residential Real Estate Market Report
  • September 2025 Chester County Residential Rental Market Report
  • September 2025 Downingtown Area School District Residential Real Estate Market Report
  • September 2025 West Chester Area School District Residential Real Estate Market Report

Disclaimer & Disclosure

All information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. All data and statistics are provided by Bright MLS for the period of September 2025.

The Broker makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data, whether collected directly or provided by Bright MLS or its participants. This information is subject to errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, including, but not limited to, those from data entry.

This report does not account for off-market transactions, private sales, or transactions conducted outside of Bright MLS. This report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as real estate advice. Since individual circumstances vary, all real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular needs.

red love neon light signage

Understanding Your Property Tax Assessment and Appeal Process in Chester County, PA

May 30, 2025

Spring has sprung in Chester County, and with it comes a crucial window for property owners: Property Tax Appeal season! If you own property, now's the time to pay attention, because Annual Property Tax Appeals can only be filed from May 1st through the first business day in August each year. This is your opportunity to review your assessment and ensure it accurately reflects your property's value.

Property taxes are a significant source of revenue for our county, municipalities, and school districts, directly funding essential services like public safety, education, and human services. If you believe your property's assessment isn't fair, Pennsylvania law gives you the right to appeal.

Why Your Chester County Property Assessment Might Be Outdated (Even for New Construction!)

Did you know Chester County hasn’t had a countywide property reassessment since 1998? That’s right—your property's value for tax purposes is likely still based on market conditions from over two decades ago. Unless you’ve added new construction or significant improvements that triggered an interim assessment, your tax assessment might be seriously out of step with today’s market.

The last full reassessment became effective in 1998. Since then, property values have shifted dramatically due to inflation, changing neighborhoods, and broader market trends—but your fundamental assessment might remain unchanged.

Even if you've recently built a new structure or made significant improvements that led to an interim assessment, these new values can still be challenged. This is because those interim adjustments are calculated using the existing (and often outdated) assessment methodology. If you feel your assessment doesn’t reflect your property’s actual value in today's market, you have the right to challenge it.

Understanding Assessments and Appeals

Simply put, your assessment is the value Chester County assigns to your property for tax purposes, used to calculate your tax bill alongside the millage rate set by various local authorities.

An interim assessment happens when you make certain improvements that increase your property's value, like building an addition or a new pool. These adjustments are usually effective the month after completion, and you'll receive a notice detailing the change.

If you don't agree with your property's assessment or the effective date of an interim assessment, you have the right to appeal to the Chester County Board of Assessment Appeals.

There are two main types of appeals:

  1. Annual Appeal: You can challenge your total assessment each year.
  2. The filing window for Annual Appeals is specifically from May 1st through the first business day in August. It’s important to know that your assessment may be lowered, raised, or stay the same after an appeal. If successful, the change takes effect for the following tax year.
  3. Interim Appeal: You can challenge an assessment increase due to new construction or improvements.
  4. These must be filed within forty days of receiving your Assessment Change Notice. If successful, the change is effective from the date of the interim assessment.

There's a processing fee for each appeal (check the county website for current amounts), payable to the Chester County Treasurer. You'll need to obtain specific appeal forms by calling the Assessment Office or visiting their website – remember they need to be printed and mailed, not faxed or emailed.

At the appeal hearing, you'll have the chance to present information supporting your opinion of value, such as recent appraisals or sales data for similar properties. The Board will then determine a fair market value for your property.

What If You Disagree After the Appeal?

If you're not satisfied with the Board's decision, you can take your appeal to the Court of Common Pleas within 30 days. For details on that process, you'd contact the Chester County Law Library or the Prothonotary's Office.

Have Questions About Your Property Assessment or Considering an Appeal?

Navigating the property tax appeal process can feel overwhelming, but you don't have to go it alone. While Trago Realty cannot guarantee specific results for any appeal, we're here to help you understand your property's market value in today’s Chester County landscape.

We'd be happy to talk through your situation with you on a one-on-one basis, review your assessment, and point out any potential red flags or opportunities.

Call Trago Realty today for a personalized conversation about your property's assessment!

Disclaimer: All property tax and assessment information is based on publicly available sources, including the Chester County Assessment Office (Chesco.org), the Pennsylvania State Tax Equalization Board (STEB), and the West Goshen Township’s 2022 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. This information is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal, financial, or real estate advice. Individual circumstances vary, and real estate decisions should be based on professional guidance tailored to your specific situation. Please contact Trago Realty or your real estate agent to discuss your particular situation and/or needs.

🏡 Fair Housing Month & Student Housing in Pennsylvania: A Closer Look at Equity, Access, and Policy Reform

April 4, 2025

April is recognized as National Fair Housing Month—a time to reflect on the ideals of fairness and equal access to housing. At the time this blog post was written in 2025, federally, there are seven protected classes under the Fair Housing Act (US Dept. of HUD: https://www.hud.gov/helping-americans/fair-housing-act-overview): race, color, national origin, religion, sex (including gender identity and sexual orientation), familial status, and disability.

In Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA) extends protections even further, covering up to 12 classes, including (PA Dept of Community & Economic Development Fair Housing In PA: https://dced.pa.gov/housing-and-development/fair-housing/):

  • Race
  • Color
  • Sex
  • Religious creed
  • Ancestry
  • National origin
  • Disability
  • Age (but only 40 years and older)
  • Use of a guide or support animal
  • Pregnancy
  • Familial status
  • Retaliation

One area that may deserve more exploration is age. Under current Pennsylvania law, individuals under the age of 40 may not be protected from housing discrimination based solely on age. This raises an interesting question:

Should adults aged 18 and older be protected under state law in the same way those 40 and older are?

Especially when it comes to housing access for college students and young renters, this question might become even more relevant.

🎓 Student Rental Permits: A Policy Worth Reconsidering?

Municipalities such as West Chester Borough—home to West Chester University—enforce policies like student rental permitting. While such policies may be intended to maintain neighborhood balance or control density, they might also create certain unintended consequences that disproportionately affect student renters and the broader rental market.

For example:

  • These policies could create an artificially limited supply of student rental housing.
  • Rents might become inflated due to scarcity.
  • Students—most of whom are legal adults—may find themselves restricted from renting in areas based solely on matriculation status.
  • Landlords who do not hold a student rental permit may be unable to lease their homes to qualified student tenants.
  • Permit holders may have fewer incentives to improve property conditions due to demand outpacing supply.

Of course, not all municipalities enforce these policies in the same way, and not all students experience housing insecurity. But in some markets, the cumulative effect may be driving up costs while limiting options for both tenants and property owners.

🎓 Are Housing Costs Fueling the Student Loan Crisis?

While much of the national conversation around student loan debt focuses on tuition, it may be worth considering how rising housing costs—especially in college towns—may also be contributing to the student debt burden. In municipalities with restricted student housing options or limited permit availability, rental prices for student-eligible properties can become inflated due to high demand and constrained supply.

When landlords are able to charge a premium for properties with student rental permits, it’s possible that students are absorbing those higher costs—often with financial aid, federal student loans or private student loans. In these scenarios, students aren’t just borrowing to pay for books and classes; they may also be borrowing to afford rent that’s been elevated by municipal regulation or market distortion.

This pattern could be one of several factors that contribute to the ongoing student loan crisis:

  • Students may borrow more to afford off-campus housing in restricted rental markets.
  • Limited competition due to permit caps or zoning regulations could prevent market-driven pricing.
  • Long-term financial impacts might follow students into adulthood, as they pay interest not only on their education—but also on the basic cost of living.

While more data is needed to draw direct correlations, it’s worth examining whether housing policies that limit student access to rentals are inadvertently encouraging greater reliance on debt—and whether that reliance might be quietly exacerbating the student loan crisis.

🏛️ A Legislative Perspective: HB 809 & HB 121

Lawmakers in Pennsylvania have proposed pieces of legislation that may help to address some of these housing challenges for students.

🔓 HB 809 – Preempting Municipal Bans on Student or Unrelated Individual Housing

View Memo →
Introduced by Rep. Susan Helm (R-104), HB 809 proposed limiting the authority of local governments to prohibit the occupation of a dwelling by students or unrelated individuals. The bill suggests that:

  • Matriculation status (i.e., being a student) should not be grounds for exclusion.
  • Housing arrangements should not be restricted solely because the tenants are unrelated.
  • Reasonable criteria—like parking availability, occupancy limits, and code compliance—should guide decisions, rather than assumptions about who the tenants are.

Helm noted that municipalities may have valid concerns about health, safety, or quality of life—but targeting individuals based on their student status or relationship structure may not be the most equitable solution.

This proposal might offer a more consistent, statewide approach to housing policy while still allowing municipalities to address legitimate issues through neutral standards.

🛠️ HB 121 – A Student Tenant Bill of Rights

View Memo →
Introduced by Rep. Joe Ciresi (D-146), HB 121 aims to support student renters by requiring:

  • The PA Department of Education to create a Student Tenant Bill of Rights.
  • A one-time online course on tenant rights, safety standards, and common landlord-tenant issues.
  • Colleges and universities to share these materials with students before or during their move to off-campus housing.

The idea here is that when students are equipped with practical knowledge, they may be more prepared to identify unsafe housing conditions or unfair treatment. If implemented effectively, this could contribute to better outcomes for both student renters and landlords.

💬 A Perspective on Fairness, Choice & Property Rights

From a broader perspective, policies that limit who can live where—based on age, student status, and/or family structure—may deserve deeper scrutiny. Students are often legal adults, yet they may encounter barriers to housing access that older adults do not.

Likewise, property owners who wish to rent to students might face unique restrictions that affect the value or use of their real estate. In some cases, this could alter market dynamics in ways that might not benefit renters, landlords, or long-term residents.

Perhaps there’s room for policy adjustments that better balance community interests with individual rights and economic opportunity.

A Question of Perspective: Applying the Fair Housing Lens

Consider this: if you were to say the statement listed below:

"No ______ allowed to live here."

And into that blank you inserted any one of the other federally protected classes—race, color, national origin, religion, sex (including gender identity and sexual orientation), familial status, or disability—it would likely be immediately recognized as a discriminatory housing practice.

When a municipality or a landlord places restrictions specifically targeting "students", it's worth reflecting on whether this practice, while perhaps not directly analogous to discrimination based on those protected characteristics, similarly limits housing access for a specific group of adults based on their status. Viewing the policy through the lens of the Fair Housing Act's fundamental principles of equal access might lead to a different perspective on policies like student rental permitting.

📣 Final Thought: Looking Forward During Fair Housing Month

National Fair Housing Month gives us an opportunity to reflect on what fair access really means. Some questions worth asking:

  • Should Pennsylvania consider adding all legal adults (18+) as a protected class under state housing law?
  • Are local student rental ordinances solving the right problems, or could they be refined to avoid unintended harm?
  • Could statewide policies—like those proposed in HB 809 and HB 121—help level the playing field for students and property owners alike?

These issues may not have simple answers. But asking the questions, encouraging dialogue, and supporting thoughtful legislation might be a good place to start.

If you like what you see...

✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends!

https://www.tragorealty.com/#subscribe

✅ Explore other March 2025 Market Reports:

⚠️ Disclaimer:

This blog post is intended as an opinion piece and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are encouraged to explore the resources of the Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") and Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, speak with a real estate and/or housing attorney, or contact your local elected officials for further guidance on tenant rights and housing regulations.

Collage of 5 Houses in Downingtown Borough, PA

Condition, Condition, Condition

April 3, 2025

The old adage “Location, Location, Location” is a fundamental truth in real estate. Of course it would be, right? After all home’s location is fixed—it doesn’t change.

In this case, all of the properties analyzed are within Downingtown Borough, meaning their location is relatively the same. However, location alone doesn’t determine price. Condition is the key variable, and as the sales below illustrate, it can cause significant differences in price—even between nearly identical homes.

Group 1: Small Condition Differences, Result in a $38,000 Price Gap

Two twin homes, just 0.1 miles apart, sold at noticeably different prices, from what I can tell due to condition.

  • 228 Mary St. (Slightly More Deferred Maintenance, Carpets Need to Be Replaced & Spackle/Paint may have gone a long way)
  • Settled: 11/22/2024
  • Price: $220,000
  • Details: 3 Beds, 1 Bath, 1,162 Sq. Ft., 0.03 Acres
  • Annual Taxes: $2,887

Exterior of 228 Mary St, Downingtown, PA 19335

  • 218 William St. (Better Condition, Less Maintenance Needed, with LVT Flooring and Paint)
  • Settled: 08/01/2024
  • Price: $258,000
  • Details: 3 Beds, 1 Bath, 980 Sq. Ft., 0.05 Acres
  • Annual Taxes: $2,756

Exterior of 218 William St, Downingtown, PA 19335

Both homes offered similar layouts and locations, yet 218 William St. commanded $38,000 more simply because it required fewer immediate repairs.

Group 2: The Value of a Full Renovation – A $124,000 Difference

Two identical twin homes on Grant Ave—just 210 feet apart—show the financial impact of condition on pricing.

  • 512 Grant Ave (Needing a "Major Rehab Needed" per the Listing's Condition Category, with NO Interior Photos Provided)
  • Settled: 04/24/2024
  • Price: $251,000
  • Details: 3 Beds, 1.5 Baths, 1,080 Sq. Ft., 0.09 Acres
  • Annual Taxes: $1,469

Exterior of 512 Grant Ave, Downingtown, PA 19335

  • 523 Grant Ave - Previously Purchased for $250,000 on 12/29/2023
  • (Recently Flipped, Move-in Ready)
  • Settled: 04/17/2024
  • Price: $375,000
  • Details: 3 Beds, 1.5 Baths, 1,080 Sq. Ft., 0.14 Acres
  • Annual Taxes: $3,483

Exterior of 523 Grant Ave, Downingtown, PA

Despite having the same layout, 523 Grant Ave sold for $124,000 more because it was fully renovated, offering buyers a turn-key home with updates.

Group 3: The Power of a Flip – A $169,500 Gain in Seven Months

This property sold twice in under a year, proving how improvements directly impact market value.

  • 512 E. Lancaster Ave (Pre-Renovation)
  • Settled: 06/03/2024
  • Price: $255,500
  • Details: 3 Beds, 1 Bath, 1,626 Sq. Ft., 0.10 Acres
  • Annual Taxes: $3,886
  • 512 E. Lancaster Ave (Post-Renovation)
  • Settled: 01/07/2025
  • Price: $425,000
  • Details: 4 Beds, 1.5 Baths, 1,626 Sq. Ft., 0.10 Acres
  • Annual Taxes: $3,982

Exterior of 512 E. Lancaster Ave, Downingtown, PA 19335

After undergoing renovations—including an added bedroom, half bathroom, and upgraded finishes—the property sold for $169,500 more in just seven months.

Location, Condition & Price

Every home in this analysis shares the same fundamental factor: location. However, it seems evident that prices vary based on condition. While location establishes the baseline for desirability, condition can significantly influence pricing.

Each home and situation is unique. If you're considering selling, reach out to one of our agents to discuss how, or if, your home could benefit from repairs and updates before listing.

If you like what you see...

✅ Sign up for our Newsletter to stay updated on next month’s market trends!

https://www.tragorealty.com/#subscribe

✅ Explore other March 2025 Market Reports:

Disclaimer:
The information provided is not guaranteed, nor does the broker warrant the accuracy of the data. Results are not guaranteed, as market conditions, economic factors, interest rates, and inventory levels all play a role in the successful sale of a home. This blog post shall not be construed as a broker opinion of value or a comparative market analysis. Any statements regarding home values, pricing influences, or market trends are for informational, and entertainment, purposes only and should not be relied upon as financial, legal, or real estate advice. Buyers and sellers should consult with a licensed real estate professional for guidance specific to their situation.

For Rent Sign

Understanding Residential Rental Rates in Chester County

July 10, 2024

Residential Rental Rates in Chester County by School District

Subscribe to our Monthly Newsletter for Chester County, PA Real Estate Market Updates & Information.

Like, Subscribe and Follow any of our social media accounts. All links can be found at the top of our website.

Thanks for taking the time to visit this blog post! Enjoy the information!

Included in this three part blog series about real estate boundaries are: 

As mentioned in the blog post from July 10, 2024, titled "Using Chester County School Districts as Geographic Boundaries for Real Estate Searches", school district boundaries often play a significant role in real estate searches in Pennsylvania. These boundaries help buyers, whether owner occupants, investors and tenants identify areas that align with their specific needs and goals.  Property values, rent prices, and appreciation rates can vary between districts, for that reason understanding the composition of Chester County's fourteen school districts is critical in making informed decisions related to each individual’s goals.

Rental rates in Chester County, Pennsylvania, can vary significantly based on location.  Factors influencing these rates include property type, proximity to local attractions, including meals and entertainment, proximity and access to highways and public transportation, local school districts, property amenities and neighborhood amenities.

Understanding these variations is essential for both renters and investors. Renters can identify areas that fit their budget, while investors can pinpoint regions with targeted rental yields. Always consider local market trends and consult reliable sources to make informed rental decisions.

Shown below are a variety of tables illustrating the differences, and similarities, rental rates between school districts, and townships within school districts.  

Chester County All Room Counts: School Districts Only

A table of all School Districts in Chester County, PA for all bedroom counts, which includes the number of transactions and each district's corresponding rent prices displayed as minimum, average, median and maximum.

Chester County All Room Counts: Townships Within Each School District

A table of each township within each School District in Chester County, PA for all bedroom counts, which includes the number of transactions and each township's corresponding rent prices displayed as minimum, average and maximum.

Chester County Studios & 1 Bedrooms: School Districts Only

A table of all School Districts in Chester County, PA for studios and 1 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each district's corresponding rent prices displayed as minimum, average, median and maximum.

Chester County Studios & 1 Bedrooms: Townships Within Each School District

A table of each township within each School District in Chester County, PA for studios and 1 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each township's corresponding rent prices displayed as minimum, average and maximum.

Chester County 2 Bedrooms: School Districts Only

A table of all School Districts in Chester County, PA for 2 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each district's corresponding rent prices displayed as minimum, average, median and maximum.

Chester County 2 Bedrooms: Townships Within Each School District

A table of each township within each School District in Chester County, PA for studios and 2 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each township's corresponding rent prices displayed as minimum, average and maximum.

Chester County 3 Bedrooms: School Districts Only

A table of all School Districts in Chester County, PA for 3 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each district's corresponding rent prices displayed as minimum, average, median and maximum.

Chester County 3 Bedrooms: Townships Within Each School District

A table of each township within each School District in Chester County, PA for studios and 3 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each township's corresponding rent prices displayed as minimum, average and maximum.

Chester County 4 Bedrooms: School Districts Only

A table of all School Districts in Chester County, PA for 4 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each district's corresponding rent prices displayed as minimum, average, median and maximum.

Chester County 4 Bedrooms: Townships Within Each School District

A table of each township within each School District in Chester County, PA for studios and 4 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each township's corresponding rent prices displayed as minimum, average and maximum.

Chester County 5 Bedrooms: School Districts Only

A table of all School Districts in Chester County, PA for 5 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each district's corresponding rent prices displayed as minimum, average, median and maximum.

Chester County 5 Bedrooms: Townships Within Each School District

A table of each township within each School District in Chester County, PA for studios and 5 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each township's corresponding rent prices displayed as minimum, average and maximum.

Based on information from Bright MLS. The data referenced includes residential lease properties in Chester County, PA, with a status of "Closed" from June 1, 2023, to June 3, 2024, resulting in 1,475 listings, some of which were excluded due to not being residential.

 Disclaimer

This information has been collected from resources deemed to be reliable, but guaranteed for accuracy. The broker, Trago Realty, does not guarantee the accuracy of the information provided. For the most current and detailed information about the respective schools, it is recommended that you contact the school districts directly.

Information in this post, and on www.tragorealty.com, is not to be construed as real estate, investing, legal, accounting, and/or insurance advice. Be sure to consult the respective specialist prior to making any decisions (e.g., real estate licensee, financial planner/advisor, attorney, CPA/tax advisor, and/or insurance agent/company).

Disclaimer: External Links

Our website may contain links to external websites that are not provided or maintained by, or in any way affiliated with, www.tragorealty.com. Please note that www.tragorealty.com does not guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of any information on these external websites.

By clicking on these links, you will be directed to a third-party site. These sites are not under the control of www.tragorealty.com, and we are not responsible for the content or accuracy of these external sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.

You should be aware that when you leave our website, other sites may have different privacy policies and terms that are beyond our control. We strongly advise you to read the privacy policies and terms and conditions of any third-party sites that you visit.

Following these links is at your own risk, and we will not be liable for any damages or losses resulting from the use of external links.

sold text

Residential Sales Prices in Chester County by School District

July 10, 2024

Residential Sales Prices in Chester County by School District

Subscribe to our Monthly Newsletter for Chester County, PA Real Estate Market Updates & Information.

Like, Subscribe and Follow any of our social media accounts. All links can be found at the top of our website.

Thanks for taking the time to visit this blog post! Enjoy the information!

Included in this three part blog series about real estate boundaries are: 

As mentioned in the blog post from July 10, 2024, titled "Using Chester County School Districts as Geographic Boundaries for Real Estate Searches", school district boundaries often play a significant role in real estate searches in Pennsylvania. These boundaries help buyers, whether owner occupants, investors and tenants identify areas that align with their specific needs and goals.  Property values, rent prices, and appreciation rates can vary between districts, for that reason understanding the composition of Chester County's fourteen school districts is critical in making informed decisions related to each individual’s goals.

Sales Prices in Chester County, Pennsylvania, can vary significantly based on location.  Factors influencing these rates include property type, proximity to local attractions, including meals and entertainment, proximity and access to highways and public transportation, local school districts, property amenities and neighborhood amenities.

Understanding these variations is essential for buyers, whether owner-occupants or investors. Owner-occupants can identify areas that fit their budget, while investors can pinpoint regions with targeted rental yields. Always consider local market trends and consult reliable sources to make informed buying and investment decisions.

Shown below are a variety of tables illustrating the differences, and similarities of sales prices between school districts, and townships within school districts.

Chester County All Room Counts: School Districts Only

A table of all School Districts in Chester County, PA for all bedroom counts, which includes the number of transactions and each district's corresponding sold prices displayed as minimum, average, median and maximum.

Chester County All Room Counts: Townships Within Each School District

A table of each township within each School District in Chester County, PA for all bedroom counts, which includes the number of transactions and each township's corresponding sold prices displayed as minimum, average and maximum.

Chester County Studios & 1 Bedrooms: School Districts Only

A table of all School Districts in Chester County, PA for studios and 1 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each district's corresponding sold prices displayed as minimum, average, median and maximum.

Chester County Studios & 1 Bedrooms: Townships Within Each School District

A table of each township within each School District in Chester County, PA for studios and 1 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each township's corresponding sold prices displayed as minimum, average and maximum.

Chester County 2 Bedrooms: School Districts Only

A table of all School Districts in Chester County, PA for 2 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each district's corresponding sold prices displayed as minimum, average, median and maximum.

Chester County 2 Bedrooms: Townships Within Each School District

A table of each township within each School District in Chester County, PA for studios and 2 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each township's corresponding sold prices displayed as minimum, average and maximum.

Chester County 3 Bedrooms: School Districts Only

A table of all School Districts in Chester County, PA for 3 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each district's corresponding sold prices displayed as minimum, average, median and maximum.

Chester County 3 Bedrooms: Townships Within Each School District

A table of each township within each School District in Chester County, PA for studios and 3 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each township's corresponding sold prices displayed as minimum, average and maximum.

Chester County 4 Bedrooms: School Districts Only

A table of all School Districts in Chester County, PA for 4 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each district's corresponding sold prices displayed as minimum, average, median and maximum.

Chester County 4 Bedrooms: Townships Within Each School District

A table of each township within each School District in Chester County, PA for studios and 4 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each township's corresponding sold prices displayed as minimum, average and maximum.

Chester County 5 Bedrooms: School Districts Only

A table of all School Districts in Chester County, PA for 5 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each district's corresponding sold prices displayed as minimum, average, median and maximum.

Chester County 5 Bedrooms: Townships Within Each School District

A table of each township within each School District in Chester County, PA for studios and 5 bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each township's corresponding sold prices displayed as minimum, average and maximum.

Chester County 6 Bedrooms or more: School Districts Only

A table of all School Districts in Chester County, PA for 6 or more bedrooms, which includes the number of transactions and each district's corresponding sold prices displayed as minimum, average, median and maximum.

Chester County 6 Bedrooms or more: Townships Within Each School District

A table of each township within each School District in Chester County, PA for studios and 5 bedrooms or more, which includes the number of transactions and each township's corresponding sold prices displayed as minimum, average and maximum.

Based on information from Bright MLS. The data referenced includes residential lease properties in Chester County, PA, with a status of "Closed" from June 1, 2023, to June 3, 2024, resulting in 1,475 listings, some of which were excluded due to not being residential.

 Disclaimer

This information has been collected from resources deemed to be reliable, but guaranteed for accuracy. The broker, Trago Realty, does not guarantee the accuracy of the information provided. For the most current and detailed information about the respective schools, it is recommended that you contact the school districts directly.

Information in this post, and on www.tragorealty.com, is not to be construed as real estate, investing, legal, accounting, and/or insurance advice. Be sure to consult the respective specialist prior to making any decisions (e.g., real estate licensee, financial planner/advisor, attorney, CPA/tax advisor, and/or insurance agent/company).

Disclaimer: External Links

Our website may contain links to external websites that are not provided or maintained by, or in any way affiliated with, www.tragorealty.com. Please note that www.tragorealty.com does not guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of any information on these external websites.

By clicking on these links, you will be directed to a third-party site. These sites are not under the control of www.tragorealty.com, and we are not responsible for the content or accuracy of these external sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.

You should be aware that when you leave our website, other sites may have different privacy policies and terms that are beyond our control. We strongly advise you to read the privacy policies and terms and conditions of any third-party sites that you visit.

Following these links is at your own risk, and we will not be liable for any damages or losses resulting from the use of external links.

Map of Chester County School District Boundaries

Using Chester County School Districts as Geographic Boundaries for Real Estate Searches

July 10, 2024

Using Chester County School Districts as Geographic Boundaries for Real Estate Searches

Subscribe to our Monthly Newsletter for Chester County, PA Real Estate Market Updates & Information.

Like, Subscribe and Follow any of our social media accounts. All links can be found at the top of our website.

Thanks for taking the time to visit this blog post! Enjoy the information!

Included in this three part blog series about real estate boundaries are: 

Chester County School Districts & Real Estate Searches

When residential owner occupants, tenants and investors are searching for real estate in Chester County, Pennsylvania, it's common for them to place a lot of weight on the school district. These boundaries can help define areas that meet buyers or tenants specific needs and goals, whether for personal residence or for making a strategic investment. Therefore, an understanding of what municipalities make-up each district can be critical.

While people may have preferences towards one school district over another, for various reasons, a buyer or tenant should never rely on the opinion of a real estate agent for the quality, or perceived quality, of education provided.  That real estate licensee should probably also refrain from providing opinions on the perceived public perception of each district, whether good, bad or indifferent.  Instead, the buyer or tenant should exercise their own due diligence and only rely on the real estate agent to quantify both, the differences between the varying districts in terms of the buyers budget and interpreting market data for levels of inventory, speed of sale, sold-to-list price ratios, number of sales and historical rates of appreciation/depreciation.

Understanding the municipality composition of each of the fourteen (14) Chester County school districts that are either headquartered in the county, or crossover into the county, can be helpful in navigating your property search.

Chester County School Districts

Below are the websites of school districts located in, or that crossover into Chester County (school districts are listed in alphabetical order):

Below are each of the school districts and the corresponding municipalities that make-up each district (note* school districts are listed in alphabetical order):

Avon Grove School District

Municipalities:

Coatesville Area School District

Municipalities:

Downingtown Area School District

Municipalities:

Great Valley School District

Municipalities:

Kennett Consolidated School District

Municipalities:

Octorara Area School District

Municipalities:

Owen J. Roberts School District

Municipalities:

Oxford Area School District

Municipalities:

Phoenixville Area School District

Municipalities:

Spring-Ford Area School District

Municipality in Chester County:

Tredyffrin-Easttown School District

Municipalities:

Twin Valley School District

Municipalities in Chester County:

Unionville-Chadds Ford School District

Municipalities:

West Chester Area School District

Municipalities:

Conclusion

Understanding the school districts in Chester County is essential for making informed real estate decisions. Whether you are looking for a personal residence or considering the investment potential of a property, knowing which school district a property is located in can significantly influence your choice. School districts provide a useful framework for defining search areas and achieving your particular goals. For the most current and detailed information about the respective schools, we recommend contacting the school districts directly.

 Disclaimer

This information has been collected from resources deemed to be reliable, but guaranteed for accuracy. The broker, Trago Realty, does not guarantee the accuracy of the information provided. For the most current and detailed information about the respective schools, it is recommended that you contact the school districts directly.

Information in this post, and on www.tragorealty.com, is not to be construed as real estate, investing, legal, accounting, and/or insurance advice. Be sure to consult the respective specialist prior to making any decisions (e.g., real estate licensee, financial planner/advisor, attorney, CPA/tax advisor, and/or insurance agent/company).

Disclaimer: External Links

Our website may contain links to external websites that are not provided or maintained by, or in any way affiliated with, www.tragorealty.com. Please note that www.tragorealty.com does not guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of any information on these external websites.

By clicking on these links, you will be directed to a third-party site. These sites are not under the control of www.tragorealty.com, and we are not responsible for the content or accuracy of these external sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.

You should be aware that when you leave our website, other sites may have different privacy policies and terms that are beyond our control. We strongly advise you to read the privacy policies and terms and conditions of any third-party sites that you visit.

Following these links is at your own risk, and we will not be liable for any damages or losses resulting from the use of external links.

Trago Realty - 610-563-3330 - One Sign - One Telephone Number

Navigating Real Estate Signage: Who's Who?

March 18, 2024

Entering the realm of real estate can feel like stepping into a whirlwind, especially when deciphering signs that hold promises of opportunities and dreams. In Pennsylvania, real estate Sellers and Landlords grapple with a unique challenge—multiple telephone numbers and names crammed onto a single sign that happens to be in front of their listing. Let's delve into this practice and explore why simplicity plays a crucial role in effective marketing.

The Sign Complexity: Juggling Names and Numbers

  • Real estate signs, and advertisements, in Pennsylvania legally have to include the Real Estate Brokerage Name and Telephone number.
  • Agents can include their own name and telephone number, but it must not overshadow the brokerage's information in size and prominence.
  • In cases involving a Real Estate Team, their name and telephone number will find space on the sign, further complicating matters.
  • To illustrate, see below: 
  • Brokerage Name - Telephone Number - Must
  • Team Name - Telephone Number - Optional
  • Agent Name - Telephone Number - Optional

The Confusion Factor: Risks of Miscommunication

  • The presence of multiple names and numbers on one sign can confuse prospective buyers, leading to uncertainty about whom to contact.
  • Dialing the wrong number of the three could lead to a missed connection with the seller's real estate agent, potentially redirecting the buyer's interest to another listing instead of yours.  

Effective Marketing Strategies: Embracing Simplicity

  • Simplifying real estate signs to feature one sign and one number can streamline the buyer's experience, reducing confusion and ensuring direct contact with the appropriate agent.
  • Clarity and accessibility hold significant value in a competitive market, fostering engagement and facilitating smooth transactions for buyers and sellers alike.

Personal Branding Dilemma: Balancing Identity with Compliance

  • Some real estate agents and teams venture into creating their logos and company names that may exceed legal parameters.
  • The question arises: Why not obtain a broker's license and establish an independent office if personal branding is a priority?
  • Does the emphasis on personal brand overshadow the primary goal of selling or leasing your listing?

In the dynamic landscape of real estate, the inclusion of personal branding raises important considerations. While personal identity and brand recognition are valuable, they should not overshadow the core objective of effectively marketing and transacting real estate properties. Striking a balance between personal branding and compliance with legal requirements is essential to maintain professionalism and trust within the industry.

In a competitive real estate market, clarity and accessibility are paramount. By prioritizing simplicity and clear communication, we aim to make the selling and leasing experience as straightforward and rewarding as possible for our clients. Say goodbye to confusion and hello to a more efficient way of connecting buyers and tenants with your property.

Disclaimer:

The content provided in this blog post is for informational and entertainment purposes only. It should not be construed as Real Estate, Legal, Accounting, Financial, Insurance, and/or Construction advice. Each individual situation is unique, and readers are encouraged to consult the respective specialist for their specific needs.

While efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of the information presented, we do not guarantee its accuracy. All information was collected from sources deemed to be reliable; however, we do not warrant the accuracy of that information. Readers are advised to conduct their own research and verification before making any decisions or taking actions based on the content of this blog post.

https://tragorealty.com/

two person standing on gray tile paving

Boutique vs Franchise Brokerages

March 18, 2024

If I were to ask you who is the McDonald’s of real estate, what company comes to mind?  Great, I agree!  There is no right or wrong answer, other than the answer that comes to mind.

When it comes to real estate, the appeal of brand recognition can sometimes distract from essential considerations when choosing a licensee to represent your interests effectively. If you're unsure about the unique value proposition of the licensee or brokerage you've interviewed, whether it's boutique or franchised, you might not be making a fully informed decision. Asking yourself if there's something you might be overlooking can be the key to making the best choice for yourself.

Key takeaways:

  • Brand Recognition Isn't Everything: Don't rely solely on brand recognition when choosing a real estate licensee. Different brokerages, even within franchises, can offer vastly different experiences and outcomes.
  • Franchise Differences: Real estate franchises differ significantly from other franchise businesses. While they provide systems and processes to agents, the customer experience can vary widely.
  • Agent Variability: Even within the same franchise brokerage, clients may experience different outcomes due to varying skill sets and experiences among agents.
  • Similarities: Both boutique and franchise brokerages share similarities in terms of oversight, licensing requirements, market knowledge, standards, legal obligations, and tools usage.
  • Advantages of Boutiques: Boutique brokerages may offer a more personalized approach, greater flexibility, and a unique atmosphere that fosters closer relationships between agents and clients. Consider these benefits when selecting a brokerage that suits your needs. 

If you’re signing an agency contract with a real estate licensee with brand recognition as a key part of your decision making, you could be making a mistake!

This isn’t a blog post that’s going to trash franchised real estate brokerages.  After all, a big chunk of my career was spent with the largest residential real estate brokerage by sales production and agent count in Chester County, which of course happened to be a franchise.  

My intent is only to educate people that real estate franchises are vastly different from other franchised businesses, like restaurants.  Sure, the Restaurant and Real Estate franchisors share similarities in the sense that both provide systems and processes to the franchisees, but the things that are provided to the customer or client can be totally different. 

You see, if you as a consumer go to a McDonald’s in California, it’s not going to be a whole lot different than a McDonald’s here in Pennsylvania.  That’s because the consistency of quality control is supposed to flow through to the customer. 

However, if you go to two real estate agents from the same franchise office here in Pennsylvania, you’re likely to get two totally different approaches and outcomes. That’s because the systems and processes delivered to the real estate franchisees are for their customers . . . THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS! Although some of these systems and processes are designed to equip the agents with the knowledge and skills they need to help their clients, one of the main focuses of the franchisee is to recruit, attract and retain as many licensees as possible. For that reason, the experience of the clients of each individual licensee varies from agent to agent, even within the same real estate brokerage.

Just like any career, people-are-people and we all possess different skill-sets, characteristics and experiences. Or more importantly two totally different levels of skill-sets and competencies. Perfect example is one agent may have 10 days of experience, whereas another may have 10 years of experience. The point being that not all practitioners are equal in ability and knowledge.   

The fact of the matter is, that we, boutique brokerages and franchise brokerages, in a lot of ways are more alike than different.

SIMILARITIES: 

  • Broker of Record oversees : In Pennsylvania, a Broker of Record is responsible for supervising real estate activities, ensuring compliance with laws and ethical standards, managing risks, training agents, representing the brokerage, maintaining records, and making key business decisions for the firm. They play a crucial role in ensuring the integrity and success of the brokerage. As you may imagine, the larger the brokerage, the less oversight the Broker of Record has over their agents and the thinner that person is spread over all of the previously mentioned responsibilities.
  • Independent Contractors: Generally speaking, most of the licensees within a real estate brokerage, whether it be a boutique or franchise, are independent contractors.  Which means the licensees are typically self-employed, therefore the franchise doesn’t oversee their work as if they were a traditional employee.   
  • Licensing and Regulation: Both boutique and national franchise brokerages are subject to the same licensing and regulatory requirements in their respective jurisdictions.
  • Real Estate Market Knowledge: Agents at both types of brokerages are expected to be knowledgeable about their local real estate markets and are able to provide guidance to clients.
  • Professional Standards: Agents at both types of brokerages are held to the same professional standards and codes of ethics, especially if they’re a REALTOR®
  • Legal Obligations: Both boutique and national franchise brokerages have legal obligations to their clients, not limited to, but including fiduciary duties and the duty to disclose material facts.
  • Marketing and Advertising: Both types of brokerages may use similar marketing and advertising strategies to promote their listings and attract buyers.
  • Negotiation Skills: Although not always the case, agents at both types of brokerages are expected to be skilled negotiators and should be able to negotiate favorable terms for their clients.
  • Technology and Tools: Both types of brokerages may use the same, or similar technology and tools to assist their agents and clients in their day-to-day activities.
  • Continuing Education: Agents at both types of brokerages are required to complete continuing education courses to maintain their licenses and stay up-to-date with industry trends and best practices.

While both boutique and national franchise brokerages share similarities, there are distinct advantages to choosing a boutique brokerage. These include a more personalized approach, greater flexibility, and a unique atmosphere that fosters closer relationships between agents and clients. Prospective clients are encouraged to weigh these benefits when deciding which brokerage aligns best with their needs and preferences.